Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 41 Next »

Deliverable

Timeframe

Due Date

Notes

Link to Work Plan with Action Items

Create a space for resources and training materials for UC libraries addressing DEIJA in cataloging, metadata and discovery

Short-term

May 2023

Determine platform

Determine criteria and scope

Who can contribute to this space?

Will the site be ongoing?

Who will be responsible for the site following our work?

Temporary page: DEIJA in Cataloging, Metadata and Discovery Resources and Training

Identify needs at each campus with regards to successful implementation of ethical and inclusive metadata practice for description, faceting, subject headings, controlled vocabularies, and authority records in SILS and UC Library Search (Alma and Primo).

Short-term

May 2023

Define what “successful implementation” means

Create survey

Create Communication & Survey Contact list

Survey campuses

Utilize survey when reviewing and updating Work Plan

Create a list of UC reparative and inclusive cataloging local projects and practices that can be shared systemwide. 

Short-term

May 2023

Create survey

Create Communication & Survey Contact list

Survey campuses

Determine if this will be a static or continually updated list

Determine who will maintain the list if continually updated

Determine where the list will live

Temporary page: UC Reparative and Inclusive Cataloging and Metadata Projects and Practices

Create a directory of campus personnel with description and discovery-related DEIJA expertise or responsibility (i.e. NACO, SACO, Linked Data, Language, Accessibility)

Midterm

July 2023

Determine platform

  • Question: is this just for the EIMPPT to use, or for other UC staff? If the former, Confluence would be sufficient. If the latter, I would again suggest Google Drive.

Add language as one of the expertise categories?

  • I think adding language is an excellent suggestion

Make concrete recommendations for addressing representation issues with vocabularies, including misrepresentation due to factual error or bias and underrepresentation or erasure due to lack of specific headings.

Long-term

October 2023

Should we also recommend alternative vocabularies, like Homosaurus?

Develop best practices to create anti-racist and anti-biased description and classification for a more equitable, diverse and inclusive UC Library Search

Long-term

October 2023

Make concrete recommendations for reparative cataloging for catalogers and systems personnel

Long-term

October 2023

Maybe more clarity on “concrete recommendations” for the deliverables that have this phrase? From presentations related to ethical cataloging, it seems sometimes the hardest part about this work isn’t identifying that there is a problem, it’s how to make the decision on what to do about it. +1 +1

Make concrete recommendations for improved DEIJA discovery experience 

Long-term

October 2023

Would we need to bring in others who are more of the experts in front-end discovery systems?

Identify which groups are responsible for changes at local, national and/or international levels (e.g., local-level, SILS Operations Team, Operations Subteams, Leadership Group)

Midterm

July 2023

This could be interesting given that we largely work in OCLC, so local decisions can potentially have national/international impact

Hold regular updates with the stakeholders

Throughout

Communicate throughout with SILS RM, SILS Discovery, CMCKG, SCCMCKG, EDICKG, and local campus diversity committees

Present at SILS Town Hall(s)

Release draft recommendations in October 2023

Create final report

Long-term

December 2023

  • No labels