Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 5
Next »
Attendees
Erica Zhang (co-chair)
Carla Arbagey (co-chair)
Yoko Kudo
Jared Campbell
Lisa Mackinder
Nicole Arnold
Rebecca Culbertson
Regrets:
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Gather & Announcements | Assemble as a group and share info | 5 | Team | | | |
2 | Interim Report | Update on our progress | 10 | Carla, Erica | | Deadline of 6-8 weeks for OT Cover Letter + Report Draft comments | |
3 | Looking Ahead, Workplan Review | Think about what we would like to accomplish in the next few months | 30 | All | What approaches should we take with the remainder of our work - finish discussion of the spreadsheet questions? Linear style or tackle all questions - are there any dependencies? Any other ideas about what we need to discuss in our second year? | | |
4 | Work plan goal discussion: Provide recommendations for models of work | Compile a list of questions from our documents & discussions; decide which questions our group can answer, and which an ongoing group could tackle; decide on recommendations to propose | 15 | Carla/All | Questions and Proposed Recommendations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AjbCCgcFJGjfOChyGyr2CK6jzWXbx0mnqVMKtCw--Nw/edit Voting on Recommendations (Selection, Ingest): SCP to handle adding OA monographs to the NZ New OA Group to evaluate CZ collections Pathways for campuses to recommend one-off resources, bypass evaluation at the UC level Pathways for campuses to help with creating records/e-portfolios, using Alma’s automated portfolio loading capabilities
Notes: | Vote on “Can SCP take on individual monographs in similar workflows to serials”. Vote passes. Vote passes for we will help with NZ (Ingest section of spreadsheet) …SCP will get record from OCLC | |
5 | Report back from SILS groups | Understand what other SILS groups and campuses are doing in relation to OA | | All | | | |
6 | Wrap up & Homework | Review actions and decisions | | Team | | | |
7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | | Team | How to find items that are OA but have slipped thru the cracks, not being labeled OA? Something coming from Discovery group Another area is to rethink JSC and whether they want to continue approval role. Considering ongoing maintenance of OA in Alma/Primo - who is responsible? Statistics/Resource Management as related to the workflow Related to CZ Updates Task List: Consider a cleanup project to compile a list of open access collections in the IZ that are already activated in the NZ. Deactivate and delete those collections from the IZ. This would help with maintenance since we would not have to sift through redundant data if we decided to use the CZ updates task list. Solving the missing OA links issue: determine what is within our scope: From Becky: UCSD’s Serials Cataloging Group has the following info as to how UCSD is handling this. Please read the following especially the Content Corner Update: “Are we doing anything with the Community Zone Updates Task List at the moment? When a portfolio is deleted from a community-managed CZ collection, the IZ copy of the portfolio is deactivated and unlinked from the CZ and becomes a "local" portfolio. We currently have no way of being notified of these changes except via targeted periodic sweeps. Using the CZ updates task list would give us a list of updates that directly affect our resources. Who would review the updates, how often, etc.? Who would take care of
a. Content corner: 2022 Alma CKB Release Notes: September-December b. Who would review the list of the updates and do the cleanup? TBD.
| | |
8 | | Total | 60/60 | | | | |