Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Date

11:00 AM

Attendees

  • Mark Marrow, UC Berkeley

  • Jason Newborn, UC Davis

  • Linda Michelle Weinberger, UC Irvine

  • Elizabeth Rodriguez, UCLA

  • Sahra Klawitter, UC Riverside

  • Judea D’Arnaud, UC San Diego

  • Micquel Little, UC San Francisco

  • Scott Hathaway, UC Santa Barbara

  • Kristen Cardoso, UC Santa Cruz

  • Joe Ferrie, California Digital Library

  • Joe Ameen, UCM (Liaison)

Not attending

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Check-in/Updates

Helping to support each other by making space for initial discussion.

5

Chair

Policy and Practice Coordinators (PPC) Meeting Recap

Worked on building team charter. Introduce Phase 3 Critical Issues. 

Not a lot given to that group from Ex Libris.

Looking at items to ensure that they were marked appropriately and bring back to FGs. This will result in decision pages created by the specified group.

Elizabeth can bring questions or concerns from this group to the PPC.

The list of critical issues is a working document created by earlier groups to not forget issues.

Create a “parking lot” in Google Drive for questions or content to bring to other meetings.

2

Team Charter

Review charter submissions

Objective

Expectations

Roles

as a group to start firming up and add to Confluence.

20

All

Expectations: Will combine into sections; highlighting themes such as procedures, communication and decision making.

This document can be modified or added to.

Objective: There are two proposed options.

Roles: Timekeeping is the responsibility of everyone on the group. The lead will work to keep the team on task.

Facilitators may change depending on meeting subject.

Elizabeth is the Meeting Organizer.

Joe Ameen will take notes. Kristen Cardoso will be the back-up. If both are out, the rotation will be alphabetical.

Elizabeth will take a first pass at sorting and shortening the existing expectations document.

The team can comment on this document or vote on changes in the suggestions.

Micquel will work on the Objective document, trying to combine the sentiments of the proposed options.

3

Phase 3 Critical Issues

Discuss Phase 3 critical issues currently assigned to our group.

  • What should we take ownership of?

  • Is there shared ownership?

  • What should be given to another group?

  • Can we think about starting any of these now?

  • Is the urgency assigned to each correct?

  • Can/should anything be broken into several?

If there’s time, discuss any issues not currently assigned to our group that we think should be.

35

All

4

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

5

Total

x/x

Future agenda items

  • No labels