Date
11:00 AM
Attendees
Mark Marrow, UC Berkeley
Jason Newborn, UC Davis
Linda Michelle Weinberger, UC Irvine
Elizabeth Rodriguez, UCLA
Sahra Klawitter, UC Riverside
Judea D’Arnaud, UC San Diego
Micquel Little, UC San Francisco
Scott Hathaway, UC Santa Barbara
Kristen Cardoso, UC Santa Cruz
Joe Ferrie, California Digital Library
Joe Ameen, UCM (Liaison)
Not attending
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Check-in/Updates | Helping to support each other by making space for initial discussion. | 5 | Chair | Policy and Practice Coordinators (PPC) Meeting Recap Worked on building team charter. Introduce Phase 3 Critical Issues. Not a lot given to that group from Ex Libris. Looking at items to ensure that they were marked appropriately and bring back to FGs. This will result in decision pages created by the specified group. Elizabeth can bring questions or concerns from this group to the PPC. The list of critical issues is a working document created by earlier groups to not forget issues. |
| |
2 | Team Charter | Review charter submissions as a group to start firming up and add to Confluence. | 20 | All | Expectations: Will combine into sections; highlighting themes such as procedures, communication and decision making. This document can be modified or added to. Objective: There are two proposed options. Roles: Timekeeping is the responsibility of everyone on the group. The lead will work to keep the team on task. Facilitators may change depending on meeting subject. Elizabeth is the Meeting Organizer. | Joe Ameen will take notes. Kristen Cardoso will be the back-up. If both are out, the rotation will be alphabetical. |
The team can comment on this document or vote on changes in the suggestions.
|
3 | Phase 3 Critical Issues | Discuss Phase 3 critical issues currently assigned to our group.
If there’s time, discuss any issues not currently assigned to our group that we think should be. | 35 | All | These will be ongoing and we will address these issues as well what we receive from Ex Libris. Alma training materials may be helpful to contextualize some of the issues that we will be discussing. (https://exlibris.libguides.com/alma/fulfillment) Fulfillment Structure - Critical. Ex Libris met the RFP requirements assuming the implementation of a fulfillment network. There are a few different options and the group will have to explicitly choose which option to move forward with. Third party system integration: This will likely need to be shared with the Patron Data and Systems groups. MIcgration, distribution, and presentation on CDL shared resources: It looks like this decision was already made and that we’ll be going with Alma’s Uresolver. The group believes that the Fulfillment Structure is likely the top priority and will inform other work down the line. There are other issues that will arise. Specifically, what goes into how patrons will be able to interact with resources and services at other locations? | Below is a list of issues and what we’ve decided the status is. It is also noted if other groups should be involved. Fulfillment Structure - Critical (Top Priority) DDS - Critical Patron fines and fees cleanup - Critical Third party system integration - Critical. Groups: Fulfillment & ILL, Systems, Patron Data Patron data clean-up/standardization - Critical Groups: Fulfillment & ILL, Patron Data Historical Circulation data migration - Critical Extra-consortial (broker-based) ILL - Critical Groups:Fulfillment & ILL, Resource Sharing |
|
4 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | Institutional Zone - Information at the local level. Network Zone - Information that Primo is able to display to users, much of this from other locations. There will be shared bib records held in the community zone. | ||||
5 | Total | x/x |