Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Zoom https://UCOP.zoom.us/j/93370876193?pwd=T2pZN2NLMUt0di9pNTNYMUtXSHcyQT09
Meeting ID: 933 7087 6193
Password: 344581
+1 669 219 2599 US (San Jose)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 213 338 8477 US (Los Angeles)

When you join the meeting, rename your Zoom name to your name + SILS group (Go to Participants, find your name, click on More, then Rename.)

Attendees

  • Lena Zentall, Project co-manager, (SILS Chair co-chair)

  • Aislinn Sotelo, Shared Governance Task Force

  • Beth Callahan, Public Services EL

  • Carla Arbagey, Acquisitions & ERM FG

  • Carlo Medina, Implementation Coordinators

  • Catherine Busselen, ILS Data Cleanup

  • Cathy Martyniak, RLF SILS Planning Group

  • Claudia Horning, Digital Collections FG

  • Danelle Moon, Archives & Special Collections EL

  • Dominque Turnbow, Internal Training

  • Elizabeth Miraglia, Resource Management FG

  • Elizabeth Rodriguez, Fulfillment & ILL FG

  • Greg Ferguson, Patron Data

  • Jess Waggoner, Discovery FG

  • Joe Ferrie, Fulfillment & ILL FG

  • John Riemer, Technical Services EL

  • Josephine Tan, Discovery FG

  • Lisa Spagnolo, Acquisitions & ERM FG

  • Mary Elings, Archives & Special Collections EL

  • Melanie Romero, End User Outreach

  • Rachel Jaffe, Digital Collections FG

  • Rikke Ogawa, Public Services EL

  • Sarah Wallbank, Resource Management FG

  • Stacy Brinkman, End User Outreach

  • Stephen Gurnick, Patron Data

  • TJ Kao, ILS Data Cleanup

  • Tom Bustos, Implementation Coordinators

  • Xiaoli Li, Technical Services EL

Guests

  • Ben Alkaly, Communication Operation Leads

  • Günter Waibel, SILS Project co-chair

Not attending

Christine Barone, (Co-chair) Project co-manager

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Zoom name

When you join the meeting, rename your Zoom name to your name + SILS group (Go to Participants, find your name, click on More, then Rename.)

1

Lena

2

Poll: Record meetings?

Determine whether meetings should be recorded?

1

Lena

3

Welcome from SILS co-chairs!

5

Günter



4

Why have an All Chairs meeting

What’s the value of an All SILS Chairs meeting 

  • Ensure SILS Steering (co-PMs and co-chairs) are informed of what’s happening in the project.

  • Take the temperature; surface issues early

  • Forum for issues that require discussion

  • Provide direct access to SILS co-chairs to answer questions and advise

  • Relationship building; interact and learn from other chairs; safe space to speak among chairs; build trust

  • Ensure cross-project dialog for chairs at least once a month

  • With so many members, it may be a challenge to give everyone a chance to talk at these meetings.

5

Lena

5

Step B representatives

Step B members (“liaisons”) represent a campus that has assigned a liaison for
informational purposes; liaisons share information and decisions with their campus
colleagues and respond to information requests from Step A group members; liaisons do
not participate in decision-making or attend meetings, but they proactively track group
information and decisions using the available documentation and communication
mechanisms;

Awareness of participation and voting for Step B representatives

  • Shared Gov said Step B liaisons do not participate in voting or attend meetings. However, WG doesn’t want to discourage participation.

  • If Step B liaisons are very active, they should consider becoming Step A members. Chairs - have a conversation about it with active Step B liaisons.

  • WG discussed and confirmed Step B liaisons do not vote. However, Step B liaisons can participate in taking-the-pulse conversations to surface concerns.

  • Remind chairs to be vigilant that Step B liaisons could pull back from commitments and activities at any point.

  • How can chairs ensure they remember who is Step A/B since Step B cannot vote?

5

Lena

6

Chairs to share with their groups on communication between SILS and campus groups (Com Leads)

  • Each SILS group has a campus representative who is empowered to be a channel of communication from the systemwide project to their local group. Campus representatives do not need to go through their Implementation Coordinator to communicate locally.  

  • Campus representatives should take concerns to: 

    • 1) their local campus group

    • 2) their SILS group co-chairs 

    • 3) Reach out to the Implementation Coordinators Group as a last resort. 

  • Campus representatives have two roles: as experts in their subject area (systemwide hat) and as representatives for their local campus (campus hat). They are expected to consult broadly at their campus.

5

Ben

7

Consultation with Communication Leads

Awareness of upcoming consultation on communication needs for groups

2

Ben

8

Taking the temperature

Summarize takeaways from pre-meeting poll and discussion

Survey responses

30

Lena, All

9

Meeting time

Poll: Choose recurring meeting time every other week:

  • Tues 1-2

  • Wednesday 9-10

  • Friday 9-10

  • Friday 10-11

5

Lena

10

Future topics

Desired tools or training topic for next 30 minute webinar?

Topics to cover next time?

Email SILS-PM-Leads-L@ucop.edu if you want to add something to the agenda or slack Christine and Lena on SILS Chairs.

5

11

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

12

Total

60/60

Future agenda items

  • No labels