Date
, 10am-11:30am
Attendees
Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine
Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced [Today’s Notetaker]
Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside
Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego
Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)
Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library
Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Discussion items
DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New items on our Confluence page | Describe what the new items are for | 10 min | Josephine | Link to Vanguard Testing Notes on Discovery Confluence Functionality Testing Page. | ||
2 | Updates from other SILS groups | Share relevant items | 15 min | Josephine Sarah | Jess and Josephine attended Archives & Special Collections Escalation Leaders group mtg last Thursday.
| ||
3 | Vanguard Buddies | Offer feedback and suggestions | 15 min | All | Jess and Josephine met for first VG buddy functionality testing today. | ||
4 | Functionality Testing | Discuss how VGs will be testing Discovery assigned tasks | 15 min | All |
| The URL for these pages can be used to linked to in Column J - “Testing Notes” - of the Discovery tab of Testing Worksheet for PPC. | |
5 | Discovery Work Flow Plan Roadmap | Evaluate timeline for more accurate dates | 15 min | All | Work Flow Plan link on our Discovery Confluence homepage. Also reference SILS Project timeline and milestones | ||
6 | Resource Management FG’s Local 856 data Decision Page | Discuss | 20 min | All |
“RMFG will consult with the Discovery FG to test the statement below that “existing 856 fields will not populate into Primo” since current experience with Primo at some Alma campuses varies. In addition whether those fields wind up in Primo will affect specific 856 data like finding aid links, etc.” “Questions to consider:
| ||
7 | Homework | Prepares team for next meeting | All |
| |||
8 | Parking Lot/Q&A | Save these issues for future discussion & comments |
|
|
|
|
Our feedback needed to provide for the RMFG’s Decisions
Decision Page | Priority vote (1-3) | Consulting group feedback due |
1 | 10/7 | |
1 | 10/13 | |
1 | 10/13 | |
1 | 10/21 | |
1 | 10/21 |