Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups

Share relevant items

15 min

Josephine

Sarah

PPC: Suggests that Discovery FG reach out to consortia to inquire what they decided to do with their NZ.

RMFG: appreciates our local 856 bibliographic data feedback that we’ve provided them to help consult on their decision page

Special Meeting: PMs, Caitlin, Neil, co-chairs of Discovery, EUOS, and Fulfillment to discuss how the groups can align our work flow and decisions.

EUOS: Josephine presented Discovery’s work timeline to EUOS on Monday (10/5). Discussion continued re: branding the SILS “ecosystem” and how that relates to Discovery’s determination of whether or not we will name Primo VE something other than “Library Search” after VG testing.

Questions to ask other consortia:

  • Did they decide to use the NZ as their union view?

  • What was the deciding factor to use/not use the NZ?

  • If they do use the NZ, who maintains it?

  • If they do use the NZ, request that URL

2

Vanguard Buddies Check-in

Offer feedback and suggestions

15 min

All

Do all buddies have Discovery admin access now?

Suggestion: the non-VG buddy shares screen and tests functionality & VG tester takes any necessary screenshots to capture and notates in the Google doc of their campuses Vanguard Discovery Testing Notes

3

Discovery Work Flow Plan Roadmap

Evaluate timeline for more accurate dates

15 min

All

Work Flow Plan link on our Discovery Confluence homepage.

4

Primo VE naming & logo

Discuss our status of whether or not we want to name Primo VE anything other than “Library Search”

15 min

All

5

Consulting on RMFG’s next Decision Pages


Review and collect our feedback to help ERM with their next two Decision Pages

15 min

All

  1. Bibliographic records to leave out of the Vanguard NZ

  2. Vanguard local RLF migration

Questions to keep in mind:

  • Are there any fields/facets that are not showing up in Primo that should?

  • Are there any impacts on Primo due to campuses migrating their data differently that are critical to resolve before test load?

  • Vanguards: Collect feedback from your local campus by 10/13
6

Homework

Prepares team for next meeting

All

7

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

 

 
Our feedback needed to provide for the RMFG’s Decisions

 

  • No labels