Post Go-Live Harvesting Metadata for Finding Aids

Legend: not started IN PROGRESS STALLED decided

Status

in progress

Scope

Post Go-Live

Description

Harvesting Metadata for Finding Aids from the Online Archive of California (OAC)

Decision

At this point, the DCFG recommends not harvesting metadata for finding aids from OAC into Primo VE, as the collection-level MARC records in Alma better represent our collections in the discovery layer.

Owning group

Digital Collections Functional Group

Approver

PPC

Stakeholders

R = DCFG
A = PPC
C = DFG, local campus stakeholders, CDL, RMFG
I = Cohort

Decision-making process

 

Priority

 

Due date

Oct 22, 2021

Recommendation

At this point, the DCFG recommends not harvesting metadata for finding aids from OAC into Primo VE.

Reasoning

During the Test Phase, DCFG experimented with harvesting finding aids from OAC into Primo VE as a metadata source for collection-level representations of digital collections. Although DCFG’s charge was to explore Primo VE’s potential for making the UC’s rare and unique digital resources more discoverable and visible, we thought this would be a useful test case. Our experience evaluating the OAC finding aids (and derivatives) in Primo VE has convinced us that this would not be a valuable process for the following reasons:

  • Many campuses have a established practice of creating collection-level MARC records for archival collections that link to the finding aids in OAC or in their local website (we may want to work with Discovery on ways to make those links more visible in Primo VE). We encourage campuses to explore creating collection-level MARC records for archival collections, and linking to finding aids and digital collections content from those records, if they are not doing so already.

  • Many or most finding aids contain no digitized content, and/or are for collections that have not been digitized. If there is digitized content in the finding aids, harvesting the finding aid metadata into Primo VE will not make the associated digitized items available.

  • For archival content that has been digitized, it is generally preferable to harvest that content from Calisphere or local repositories, or to link to it from the collection-level MARC record.

Background

Mapping Example.

Questions to consider

There may be an opportunity to create a space for campuses interested in working together to explore methods of creating collection-level records for or providing collection-level access to digital archival collections.

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Consulting local stakeholders

10/18/2021

 

In process

Review and vote in DCFG

10/18/2021

 

In process

Review and vote in PPC

10/22/2021

 

In process

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!

Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu