Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Attendees

  • Alison Lanius

  • Chan Li

  • Daisy Nip

  • Danielle Watters Westbrook

  • Ellen Augustiniak

  • Gem Stone-Logan

  • Heather Hernandez

  • John Riemer

  • Lisa Wong

  • Lynne Grigsby

  • Michele Potter

  • Sarah Sheets

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Review the charge

Develop a shared understanding of the roles, responsibilities, principles, etc.

Lynne

  • What is the extent to which we can/should recommend changes to workflows? Affirmed: not for this group to determine that we should change workflows; in part, we’re validating (this is what we’re doing; establishing agreement around our data definitions; some actions are out of scope)

  • In the charge, the data reporting requirements are prioritized in the charge; core goal for 22/23 reporting is to establish a plan/path for UCOP stats reporting and then seek to address the other reporting needs

  • Recognition (from CoUL, DOC) that annual statistics presently take too much time

  • Affirmation: this charge is scoped to data in the SILS/Alma (non-SILS data is out of scope)

  • This team should consider how we define each data requirement (e.g., proposing that we count the item record and not hand counting)

  • Regarding keeping SILS LG in the loop: We don’t want surprises; regular check-in’s and the project team should readily update



2

CDL Op Center setting up tools 

Update

Gem

  • Gem will email the group to affirm everyone has Slack and wiki access.

  • Lynne will connect with Caitlin, to confirm Google access for project team members.

3

Determining chair, vice chair? co-chair?

Lynne, All

  • The Chair schedules, helps sets agendas and facilitates meetings.

  • Ellen will serve as Chair, with Chan and Michele joining her in a steering committee.

  • Ellen will circulate a doodle poll for scheduling.

4

Meeting schedule

All

  • How often do we need to meet? It is an aggressive timeline.

  • Reporting structure? LGB requests regular updates and “no surprises” approach to big issues

  • Weekly meetings (at least to start; if we split to subgroups, could change the frequency). Aim to have a standing meeting.

See chair action above.

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

  • Experts/areas of work where we’ll need to reach out/consult: RLF reporting; Shared print reporting

6

Total

x/x

  • No labels