Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Check-in / updates

Information sharing and problem-solving

5

All

AEFG: Collaborative work w/ RMFG on import profiles: templates created, subgroup starting to test with record files. E-Res subgroup proceeding to develop model for CDL resources and attached campus POLs. Emerging testing on POL type that may affect preparation of migration data - trying to finalize that as soon as possible. Quick decision page re: pre/post-migration e-resources data clean-up to be developed in response to query from ILSDC for week of 4/12. Addition to RMFG's 856 decision page re: 856 42 inserted. Awaiting more re: Invoicing/Tax related session.

RMFG:

  • finalized a recommendation for a final MARCIVE load date at UCSD

  • finalized feedback for the PPC RLF discussion (next week)

  • Gobi subgroup met with AEFG to work out some test plans and then also with CDL to set up test import profiles

  • 2 more migration decisions left and then its workflows until go-live

DCFG: We’ll be discussing the SGTF documents on Monday and will likely have comments. We’re still exploring harvesting finding aid records from OAC, but have hit a snag and have a meeting scheduled with ExL. After that, we’ll turn our attention back to harvesting more traditional digital collections out of Calisphere as well as some local repositories.

Discovery: Working on finalizing UC-eLinks replacement name and icon; Continuing to discuss CDI and EasyActive implications

PSELG: the group met and discussed the transition of the group’s recommendation to form a subgroup to tackle the question of OA and CDI.

2

Decisions

Discuss and approve proposed decisions

30

  1. (Go-live) Local 856 bibliographic data

    1. Decision was held from last week to give AEFG a chance to review and add to it. Edit from AEFG is added.

  2. Can we review this PPC page: (Go-live) Preparation of Campus SCP Data

  3. (Go-live) MARCIVE Bibliographic Records in the NZ and campus data preparation

  •  
3

CDI

Update from ExL on whether UCs have a choice and what the timeline is for that decision:

  • There may be a possibility to switch but it is still in discussion at EXL as it has not been done before (moving from Easy Active to Fully Flexible).

  • What we do know for sure is that it is highly discouraged since untested (and this is coming from both Product Management and Development).

  • We (including Product Management) would like to continue to discuss and address any concerns you might have with EasyActive while we explore the possibility of switching CDI types and timing.

Review of response from CSU about CDI

Results of DFG discussion on data gathered during testing

Next steps

  1. ExL would like to know exactly what our concerns are with EasyActive; what is the background on this? Why do UCs not want to be on EA?

  2. Once we have this information, PMs will open a SF case documenting all concerns and questions for ExL.

  3. Other?

20

All

  1. (Go Live) CDI: Use FullyFlexible or EasyActive activation model

4

EUOS (recurring)

Awareness of anything coming up in PPC/FGs that will affect end users and should be shared with EUOS

https://docs.google.com/document/d/19pE99m3xZKp52BJVCBElm_d4bMPCpzRQt1-cW6gf_hQ/edit

5

Christine

5

PM Update

Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project

5

Christine

PMs received feedback that the P2E section covered by ExL at the data cleanup session was too generic. PMs asked Marci if it was possible to use UC data to make the examples more relevant and useful. Her answer is that ExL can use our data for more specific examples IF campuses allow it. Often there are privacy issues (e.g. finances or personal data) that prevent campuses from wanting to show their data. Next possible opportunity to use UC data would be at the Primo VE workshop in May.

Meetings:

List of meetings on Basecamp

6

Homework

7

Parking Lot

Collaborative Workflow Testing

Future meeting:

  • AEFG questions that came up were re: coordination of Analytics (cross-function?)

  • and... how the Selector role in Alma is changing (people will care, prob fits w/ AEFG, but overloads us....)

8

TOTAL

90/90

...