...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | STANDING ITEM: review Task Report | any blockers on tasks? | 5 | all | |||
2 | STANDING ITEM: Any AskSILS / SILS News or other tool requests? | Are there blockers for anything that’s come in? Are there any we need to talk about? | 5 | CN | |||
3 | Why are we talking about Rapido / RapidILL etc | Get clarity on this topic, decide on CDL investment in this idea | jf/cn/amr |
|
| ||
4 | I would recommend expanding the scope of this (Rapido) topic so that it is not about a specific technology, but about a known set of problems. | jf/cn/amr | Shall we do an analysis of the system, and try to figure out if a redesign would lead to improvements - i.e. thinking strategically. What if we did one meeting where we review the major decision pages and see if it’s good enough or not? Joe to do a document, and present at a new meeting. |
| |||
5 | Alma “resource partner directory” | Would this be useful to send to RSOST for consideration? What assistance or investigation could SOC do to help? | jf/cn/amr | ||||
6 | Rapido vs RapidILL | what’s the difference? which is better? | jf/cn/amr | ||||
7 | |||||||
8 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | ||||
9 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | update for NZ approved users; What’s the status on this? Do we need an action item? (caitlin?) Collections process automation; Let’s wait until the needs assessment of CDL Shared Collections re:SILS has been started. (Joe/Gem) tools review (confluence meeting format) (team) tools review (sils ops space opening?) (team) should silsops sign up for https://status.crossref.org/ updates? (alison) enable public (anonymous) view of user profiles in confluence? (Alison) allow ‘confluence-users' for ‘personal space’ in confluence? (alison) | ||||
10 | Total | x/x |
...