Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

  • Jharina Pascual, (acting vice-chair) UCI

  • Michelle Polchow, Chair, UCD

  • Sherry Lochhaas, CDL

  • Natalee Bell, UCSB

  • Kevin Balster, UCLA

  • Jason Dezember, UCB

  • Sarah Lindsey, UCSC (substituting for Tamara)

  • Carla Arbagey, UCR

  • Sarah Sheets, UCM

  • Katie Keyser, UCSF

  • Judy Keys, UCSD

Not in attendance:

  • Tamara Pilko, Vice Chair, UCSC (on leave)

Meeting documents:
Meeting Recording & Chat (link to file in Google Drive)

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Record: Michelle

Announcements:Multi-part e-collections decision sent to All-Chairs for preparation to review at June 20 meeting

Alma enhancement final voting has started
vote is June 24




Share announcements

5 min

Note taker: Kevin
Timekeeper: Sarah Sheets

  • Multi-part e-collection Decision going to All-Chairs

  • transition team meeting with incoming chairs

  • Licensing decision: meet with Jackie re: licensing issue isn’t direct overlap with SILS. Probably going to be a handoff to Tamara

  • SL (CDL): Licensing issue also related to Acq, would it make sense to take it back to them given how it evolved beyond the initial scope?

  • MP: Will run it by Acq. Also, if escalation method is generally going to be going to All Chairs, then Acq can see it there.

  • 2

    CDL announcements

    NZ Task Force or other activities

    10 min

    Sherry Lochhaas

    • working on final report and finishing up a few loose ends

    3

    UCOP Update

    DDA and update to FY23 survey

    10 min

    Sarah Sheets

    4

    ERES Deliverables update

    Multi-part e-collections decision sent to All-Chairs for preparation to review at June 20 meeting

    Sharing of E-Resources Licensing across UC

    5

    CRL community zone activation for member campuses

    RMFG had a recommendation from phase 4

    Phase 4 Recommendation - communication & follow-up

    10 min

    Kevin Balster

    • CRL Catalog

    • CRL Monographs

    • CRL Newspapers

    • CRL Open Access Monographs

    • CRL Open Access Newspapers

    • CRL Open Access Serials

    • CRL Serials

      After some review, I think there’s the following breakdown of resources in the various CRL CZ collections: 

    1. CRL Monographs/Newspapers/Serials (both OA and non-OA): These collections seem to contain titles that have been digitized and are available for CRL members (or everybody for the OA collections). These all contain portfolios, but aren’t indexed in the CDI.

    2. CRL Catalog: This looks to be just for titles that haven’t been digitized, so are available for members to ILL. This collection only has two portfolios, but has millions(?) of titles indexed in the CDI. 

    Prior to the migration RMFG had a recommendation to potentially activate the CRL Catalog collection in order to recreate the discovery environment we had for CRL resources in Melvyl. Consulted with UCLA RMCMOS rep, Hermine Vermeij, and we agreed that while this originally started as a RMFG decision, since it was dealing with CZ collections, it seemed like a question for ERES.

    • Michelle Polchow will check ELUNA archives to see if this has been addressed elsewhere.

    • If that doesn’t help, Kevin Balster will post question to ALMA list

    46

    Future deliverables

    Authentication/authorization protocols

    Deliverable -

    • knowledge sharing stage

    20 min

    Carla Arbagey

    Sarah Lindsey

    • authentication/authorization: largely managed by IT

    • UCR waiting on approval for OpenAthens

    • UCD has some resources configured for SSO login

    • Possible problem with single sign on managed by campus - other units on campus can effect Library access

    • Also issue with longevity of IP authentication given future browser updates that may obscure IP addresses.

    • MP: Current issues with IP authentication include lack of support for IPv6

    • SSO can be incredibly time consuming to setup - process varies for every platform. OpenAthens

    • SL (CDL): how does OpenAthens work with walk-ins?

      • Carla will check

    • OpenAthens likely passes on limited user data (just confirming a user is affiliated with a campus)

    • ALA source on future of authentication

    • JK: only implemented SSO in a few cases where necessary. Lots of time involved. Worrying to do it more broadly, but want to get ahead of it since providers offer SSO to users who may get caught not being able to use it.

    • JP: we have signed licenses where providers guarantee access, but if they switch to a method that is untenable, then would be a breach

    • cases of providers switching to SSO only

    57

    Wrap Up

    Summer Calendar -

    Review actions and decisions

    Decision regarding continued weekly meetings/ bi-weekly

    No meeting - week of 7/6

    10 min

    • No meeting first week of July

    68

    Parking Lot

    Capture important topics for future discussion:


    79

    Total

    60/60