Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Ross Anastos

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Tony Navarro

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

I copies the URLs from the old F/ILL FG to an “archived” decision page in our current OST confluence website. This can be used as a reference to older decisions made by that Functional Group before Go-Live.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions/notes

Actions

1

General Check-In

  • discuss Alma release notes (if any)

  • discuss anything relevant from All-Chairs

5

All

is anyone having problems with expired users?

  • UCI - expiration date for students is after they graduate, and for staff/faculty because they might have contract periods? this should update every time they submit a new request.

  • at UCR there’s been an amount of records where the expiration date wasn’t pulling through to other UC’s.

    • UCSC - will look into notes about a related problem, with a relatively easy fix.

    2

    Review OST workplan

    Use membership transition time (June/July) to review our workplan with “fresh” eyes including:

    • Are there items on the list that should be removed?

    • Is anything missing?

    • Priority/sequence of list?

    xx

    All

    Work Plan: Fulfillment

    Should we create an F OST Steering Committee to help filter topics to add future topics to the agenda/workplan?

    Sandra and Sahra can help out on the workplan. Will push along as we get to it, perhaps have a draft completed by September to share with the OST.

    7/15/24: will revisit workplan and steering committee after Sandra is back.

    3

    RS/F Subteam - Building Use Only book band feedback

    The RS/F subgroup developed a Building Use Only bookband and would like feedback.

    Pending feedback it will go live on July 1st, with a reminder being sent to groups on June 26th.

    This was shared with RS OST - everyone liked it, they gave valuable feedback and no suggested changes.

    		4

    Archived Fulfillment & ILL FG Decisions

    Fulfillment & ILL Functional Group Decisions (archive)

    		5

    AFN Library Use Only/RLF Barcodes

    We've been having difficulty identifying RLF material that is library use only.  I'm wondering if others are having similar experiences and how we can address it.

    Sahra/Mark/Ross

    4/25/24 updates: reviewing existing book bands; development of additional RLF LUO strategies.

    RLF Barcodes update: Campuses which retain local holdings for items that go to an RLF result in two barcodes and two holding records. For the campuses that do retain them, the records are suppressed so they're not discoverable but if you scan the barcode then the record will come up.

    The conversation about barcodes should happen with the resource management group, and the local campuses which retain those records.

    We can share the impact and give input/feedback on the implication for us, but it's ultimately up to RM since they would be changing their workflows.

    Start google doc to record impact and implication on campuses. determining a unified process would be ideal. since these items are being sent across the system it has a potential to impact multiple campuses.

    Possible solutions:

    Pose question to All-Chairs or directly to an OST (resource management?). See which solution in the google doc is the least painful.

    Since All-Chairs is going through a transition phase right now, perhaps we wait until that settles? Or at the very least Ross could pose the problems/solutions as a primer and the group can discuss after the membership transition is complete.

    64

    Damaged AFN item form/process

    xx

    Damaged Item form & process

    6/14: Draft of decision page complete. Feedback from F OST before sharing with RS OST?

    Should items be returned with a printout of the form?

    Should we always use a ziplock bag to return damaged items/wet material?

    to do:

    • get final review/comments from F OST

    • encourage use of a ziplock back for returning damaged/wet material?

    • Modify all Power Automate Flow emails to send to each campus' AFN email as per Library Fulfillment Directory.

    • Reach out to RS OST for review/comments.

    75

    Modification of On Hold Shelf letter

    xx

    All

    Modification of On Hold Shelf letter

    6/14: Draft of decision page complete. Feedback from F OST before sharing with RS OST?

    To do:

    • Get final review/comments from F OST.

    • Reach out to RS OST for review/comments

    86

    Ad hoc/open discussion

    • Ross will send out a temporary meeting hold for July '24 - June '25 until Sandra can finalize the meeting information.

    • Our next meeting conflicts with ALA (potentially) so we might see a lower turnout than normal.

    97

    Fulfillment Work Plan

    Ongoing review and update as needed.

    Work Plan: Fulfillment

    xx

    Ross

    Housekeeping as needed?

    108

    Wrap up/Topics for next time

    5

    All

    parking lot:

    • Ongoing letter maintenance. Is there value in doing ongoing maintenance of letters; maybe quarterly? Make sure that each campus is sending consistent messaging. Related to the text that we word-smithed in the line above. 3/11 - Will leave on agenda for a few meeting cycles and revisit after decision page for On Hold Shelf letter is finalized.

    Sahra’s ideas for additions to workplan

  • Identify from each campus what information is anonymized in Alma. I know what we anon, but not about the rest of the campuses. in particular find history and attachments.

    • In relation to billing. we haven’t worked out items that are backlogged in VDX (along with items that are still going thru VDX). are we still billing for those items or calling a wash? also items that go into a black hole and never reach their destination or are lent but never come back. unity issue (develop process for tracking these items? I think we discussed this in the past? circle back with RS OST)? who’s responsible? how do we move forward

    For future discussion:

    • Each campus should share what we use for ID cards: Mag Swipe, Barcode, RFID, Mobile ID, etc. Discuss how we can provide better service to users who borrow materials outside of their home campus. Potential mix of staff training and user education?