...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Record the meeting | remind Alison to record meeting | 1 | Alison | ||||
| 2 | Go over feedback from RS OST 27th | What is next step? | 10 | Alison | PT thinks likely good enough - should we give ‘deadline’ to larger OST? open question: which (any) other institutions need borrower entity separated within institution? → don’t need to delay schedule c support for this answer | 3
| ||
| 3 | distribution of the reverse engineer lending counts | (assuming borrower report is okay) hold for meeting with ExL about lending reports
| ||||||
| 4 | Project checkin (timing, take extension??) | 10 | Everyone | data submissions (schedules A, D, E, F) are due ; the deadline for Schedule C has been extended to | 4not yet ready to say we don’t need extension | |||
| 5 | Alison give any updates about escalation of lending report | 10 | Alison | 5preference to look into physical counts first possibly/likely another meeting for digital counts | ||||
| 6 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | 6next time: regroup about ExL meeting → next steps for borrower report → strategy for lending report → ??? delivery to ucop date checkin ??? | ||||
| 7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | since ‘reverse engineered’ would have to be run by SOC (CDL), how would data/report results be distributed? dates (maybe later) → by months for reports | |||||
| 78 | Total | x/x |