Attendees
Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz
Jared Campbell, UC Davis;
Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles
Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego
Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair
Joe Ameen, UC Merced;
Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;
Zach Silveira, UC San Francisco
Sean Claudio, UC Irvine
Not Present
Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley
Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara
...
Meeting Recording: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17O-3uEcfE3f9Hxfb0CbdF0FjpFQNjxX-/view?usp=share_link
Excerpt | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
AFN Consortia block decision page, Database Search failures, Hathi Trust ranking |
Item | Desired Outcome | Notes | Decisions / Discussion | Actions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sharing and Updates | Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups |
| ||||||
2 | UX Subgroup updates | N/A | |||||||
3 | Database Search | Review and fill out decision page | 4 | Hathi Trust | AFN Consortial Block Decision Page | https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FUL/pages/2041217066/UC+AFN+Consortia+Blocks “As stakeholders in this decision, we are seeking your input (and any of your local library/campus staff you deem appropriate) in this proposal” | Discovery endorses this position An existing issue is that users with blocks see a page that simply says the page isn’t available for their user group. We’ll want to review that language and find something more informative. If they are blocked because of a user group, it should say so. If they are blocked because of a billion fines, it should say that. |
| |
4 | Database Search | Need examples | Decision Page: Database Search Collecting https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JBn7QAtqNV1A7IhBB1nqg5GnSCUqvp7GlfHKI5HMIa4/edit?usp=sharing |
| |||||
5 | Hathi Trust | Need examples | OT felt questions and next steps related to this report would best be handled by the Discovery Operations SubTeam. We empower Discovery to review and decide the priority and feasibility of this work and if appropriate, decide that work related to this report is not feasible at this time. | 5 | Exclude records from Discovery Network | The indexes need to be set up in NZ also. Waiting on…ticket with ExL about how the boosting interacts. They may not know that this is a problem that we’re struggling with. We don’t think the problem (Records from Hathi Trust missing in CDI) is the problem. We think that the CDI records are simply ranking lower than UC held items. |
| ||
6 | Any outstanding SLACK questions or other things that have come up? | ||||||||
7 | Review Workplan | Postponed | |||||||
8 |
Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts
Review the possibility of leveraging Idea Exchange and enhancement points to get stuff we want developed… developed.
...