| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem solving | 2:30-2:55 pm (25 mins) | All | PM - 9/3 Special Meeting: no one has signed up for that date. Are there any pressing issues or compelling reasons to hold that meeting? If not, is it ok to cancel? ExL will be busy preparing to deliver the environments on 9/4 40 | All | Discovery: renaming their testing page to VE User Interface. Should a new page be made for future testing? From chat: Liz M votes for making a new page. Per Xiaoli, will probably need 2 testing spreadsheet pages. DCFG testing spreadsheet is here. It might change a bit! Fulfillment: The config form was submitted today. Yay! ACQERM: Might need another session with ExL, but would like to review the session on 8/27 and work in the VG a bit before deciding if they really need another session. TBD. Feels like they are not quite ready with their testing. This will be iterative. Xiaoli suggests that after we test for a couple of weeks, another PPC meeting can be set up to examine the workflow.
| | |
2 | Vanguard testing | | 2:5540-3:45 | All | Data security | 3 | DCFG testing spreadsheet is here. It might change a bit! CDL-managed data group: will also be testing in the NZ; there is overlap with Discovery. Does it make sense for both groups to test the same things?
Every data point cannot be tested for. What are the decisions we actually need? What is most important for day 1? Each group has to use the idea of an MVP rather than striving for perfection. What can’t be reversed? Test that first. Do we want the PPC group to review all the spreadsheets? Maybe everyone takes another pass at completing/finessing their test scenarios What is the deadline for testing scenarios?
| | - PPC - if anyone wants to meet with the SC, email Xiaoli to set up a time.
|
3 | PM updates | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVGH5aiO2l1CM1ApW6-bNH8SADCW7iZ9-mrRME7JPUM/edit | 3:45-4:00 | Christine | 9/3 office hours: As of now, there have been no questions submitted and ExL would appreciate the extra time to work on preparing the VG environments. Would you and your teams be ok with canceling this meeting? Data security acknowledgement forms - everyone (includes local campus testers, ICs, FGs) will need to complete the form before getting an account. Completing Note: completing the form does not guarantee that you will be given an account. Accounts are created at the discretion of the Implementation Coordinators. This applies more to local campus requested accounts at non-VG campusesverbiage does not apply to FGs. If ICs have any questions about the accounts from ACQERM and Fulfillment, they did what they did to create flexibility to be able to see a variety of data.
| | |
4 | Homework | | | | | | |
5 | Parking Lot | | | | | | |
6 | | TOTAL | / 80 | | | | |