| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Check-in / Update | Report any major changes in availability / circumstances | 5 | All | | | |
2 | Anything issues from Slack, Email, Basecamp that need discussion, action? | | 5 | All | | | |
3 | Testing and access to the vanguard | Checkin on progress | 15 | All | Testing agreed upon: Give the vanguard campuses a while to get their own house in View-only access for people to see what UC data would look like in the NZ Patron data viewing was the hang-up But we’re all UC employees - shouldn’t that cover us? If we can solve the patron data problem, what kind of permissions would be needed to see what they need to see?
Needs survey to find out which modules and which things people need to see - in order to create the set of roles needed for “Vanguard buddy” - is it a reciprocal relationship, where the non-VG gets access to the data / env, and the VG campus gets to ask some questions and stuff? FGs: get immediate access and a different testing plan that empowers all members
| | - Caitlin Nelson will followup with Sarah to ensure she’s aware of the concerns from ICs about vanguard environment.
- Caitlin Nelson to follow up on “who’s got that cheat sheet on Alma roles”
- Caitlin Nelson to start a non-VG survey of local SILS testing needs (spreadsheet)
|
4 | Checkins with vanguard campuses | Check how things are going individually with vanguard ICs | 5 | | | | |
5 | Decisions in process All-decision Rollup | Awareness of any decisions in the queue that need consultation from ICs | 5 | All | | | |
6 | Set IC agenda for July 23 meeting | | 0 | All | Short meeting 30 min? (2020-07-23 Meeting notes ) | | |
7 | Other / Homework | | | | | | |
8 | | TOTAL | 35 / 60 | | | | |