Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Date

Zoom: https://ucdlibrary.zoom.us/j/9853745772

Attendees

Not attending

Kickoff Agenda

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome!

Get the meeting started; review and understand the agenda

5

Xiaoli

2

Intros & Ice breaker

10

Xiaoli

  1. Name, title, institution

  2. If you weren’t doing your current job, what would you be doing?

3

Review group charge

25

Xiaoli

  1. Basic questions to consider:
    What is the deliverable?
    What will you do to achieve this deliverable?
    Who does the work?
    What are our working assumptions?

  2. Deliverables:
    Is this an ongoing duty or is this a time-bound deliverable? Is this deliverable clear? Is there a handoff?
    Are any deliverables “hidden” in other areas of the charge?

  3. Understand the timeline:
    Which deliverables come when?
    Which deliverables have to come first?
    What are the dependencies?

  4. Interdependencies of groups:
    Know who you report to. How are you going to report?
    Know who you have to communicate with. How are you going to communicate with them?
    Which groups will you be working closely with?

  5. When to escalate:
    No magic formula for escalating: you’ll know it when you get there.
    Per the SGTF instructions (p.29): Escalate when you need high-level consultation or are unable to reach a required consensus despite good-faith efforts When you are too uncomfortable to proceed, escalate.
    If you are in “deadlock” or “contentious discussion,” escalate.
    If it’s clear that it affects many other groups and more coordination is needed, escalate.
    If you need more resources to get through an issue, escalate.

4

Decision-making practices

Understand how best this group can make decisions

10

Caitlin

Point to SGTF document (supermajority, consent agenda, and fist-of-five)

Decision Types & Starter Mechanisms

Harmonization Principles review

“Pass it around as little as possible”

PPC handles all issues: trying to answer the question first, then assigns to FG if it needs deep review.

PPC is the “vetting” group → all problems / questions / etc. come up to PPC first, who can then assign it back to the appropriate EL group.

5

Decision documenting process

Chairs understand about the decision pages

15

Caitlin

Review the Decision template

Understand expectations for PPC group, as a member of this group (as a chair of their own group, they will be creating these): As a member of the PPC, we review the decisions and approve them.

Understand which issues can be decided at the FG level (“little fish”) and which come up to the PPC (medium / big / whale).

FG recommends → PPC approves

6

Team Charter

15

Team

Team Charter

We can continue to think about how the group will work together for the first few weeks.

7

Tools

10

Neil

  1. Confirm members have access to Slack, Shared Drive, Confluence. (See Resources for instructions)

  2. Share Virtual meeting etiquette (see Resources)

  3. Introduce Confluence for meeting notes and task tracking

  4. Inform members Confluence will be “viewable” publicly starting in May.

  5. Decision pages

8

Homework / Prep for next meeting

9

Parking Lot

Save these issues for future discussion

10

TOTAL

90 / 90

Future agenda items

  • No labels