Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups

Share relevant items

10 min

Josephine

Sarah

PPC:

Questions that came up at last PPC Mtg; no definitive answers yet -

  • Who should maintain the NZ post-GoLive?

  • Who owns the NZ?

2

Proposal for creating a Configurations Subgroup (made up of members across FG’s or IC’s)

Share background

10 min

Josephine

A few weeks ago at a SILS Chairs Mtg, someone suggested that there be a Configurations Subgroup. Discovery co-chairs met this week and agreed such a subgroup would be beneficial. Josephine drafted this proposal per the PMs' request - 

PROPOSAL:   Create a Configurations Subgroup

DESIRED OUTCOME:

Have one group make sure configurations are being done correctly and consistently

WHY:

  • An effective method to check configurations that especially will affect harmonization

  • To keep an eye on how configurations made by one group can affect the work of other groups

  • A good way to create quality control of configuration tasks

  • What is discussed and documented can provide future training materials for Internal Training Subgroup to incorporate into a training infohub

WHY NOW:

  • In anticipation that initial configurations will be adjusted during test phase, a designated subgroup taking an overarching view of configuration can improve workflow of all FGs from test load and cutover.

  • Ensure that no other groups are negatively impacted by a config decision and provides one space where areas of standardization can be identified.

  • Whatever is learned now could be folded into training

PM’s will discuss the idea to create a Configurations Subgroup at an upcoming PPC-IC Mtg to determine if such a group is needed; if so, who would be members

3

Feedback from AEFG re: CDI & EasyActive & Filter by availability

Share feedback

20 min

All

Acquisitions & E-Resources FG (AEFG)'s CDI/Primo VE Search Feedback for Discovery FG

Reference:

Ellen’s CDI & EasyActive & Filter by Availability document

Reply from Lisa Spagnolo (AEFG Co-chair): “ I think the test environment will be a good opportunity to surface any issues that may arise. There are some concerns that EasyActive will put those campuses who might need more clean-up of their e-inventory more at a disadvantage – that may be an area of some support to make it less of an issue. “

4

Configuration Recommendations Workbook

Discuss next steps

40 min

All

Configuration Recommendations Workbook

5

Homework

Prepares team for next meeting

All

6

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

  • Ebook ILL lending: problematic with Melvyl; keep in mind to test in Test phase

  • No labels