Date
, 10am-11:30am
Attendees
Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine [Today’s Notetaker]
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced
Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles
Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside
Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego
Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)
Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library
Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Discussion items
DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Updates from other SILS groups | Share relevant items | 10 min | Josephine Sarah | Internal Training Subgroup: ExL is offering three diff options for Primo VE wk-long workshop: May 17th, May 24th, or June 7th. I advocate for May 17th. Want to make sure that's good with all of you. See the proposed schedule. PPC:
Questions that came up at last PPC Mtg; no definitive answers yet -
| IT May 17 = ok PPC
|
|
| 2 | Proposal for creating a Configurations Subgroup (made up of members across FG’s or IC’s) | Share background | 10 min | Josephine | A few weeks ago at a SILS Chairs Mtg, someone suggested that there be a Configurations Subgroup. Discovery co-chairs met this week and agreed such a subgroup would be beneficial. Josephine drafted this proposal per the PMs' request - PROPOSAL: Create a Configurations Subgroup DESIRED OUTCOME: Have one group make sure configurations are being done correctly and consistently WHY:
WHY NOW:
| PM’s will discuss the idea to create a Configurations Subgroup at an upcoming PPC-IC Mtg to determine if such a group is needed; if so, who would be members Add to proposal: opportunities for enhancements going forward too. | |
| 3 | Feedback from AEFG re: CDI & EasyActive & Filter by availability | Share feedback | 20 min | All | Acquisitions & E-Resources FG (AEFG)'s CDI/Primo VE Search Feedback for Discovery FG Reference: | Reply from Lisa Spagnolo (AEFG Co-chair): “ I think the test environment will be a good opportunity to surface any issues that may arise. There are some concerns that EasyActive will put those campuses who might need more clean-up of their e-inventory more at a disadvantage – that may be an area of some support to make it less of an issue.“ | Nothing specific - background to keep in mind when testing. Will discuss more next week.
|
| 4 | Configuration Recommendations Workbook | Discuss next steps | 40 min | All | Configuration Recommendations Workbook Process: could be 1. Harmonize 2. Priority. Considerations:
Discussion Notes: include data from already-Primo campuses Lisa Ngo (Unlicensed) noted that Berkeley wants to have Primo configured in early March - taking a week to get set up b/c do not want big changes during testing. | Jess Waggoner outlined: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ck_DM8OdWl92X8Pi4aYiLNCzvfW_XuhthVdQ5myiEH8/edit Expanded documentation should be linked in the table document to more detailed documents in Google drive, e.g. if UCLA wants to customize brief display | Subgroups should expand recommendations |
| 5 | Homework | Prepares team for next meeting | All | ||||
| 6 | Parking Lot/Q&A | Save these issues for future discussion & comments |
|
|
|
|