Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 11
Next »
Attendees
Not attending
Discussion items
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
|---|
| 1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem-solving | 5 | All | AEFG: Continued progress on Import Profiles related MVP item, in collaboration with RMFG. Continued progress on initial E-Res-related MVP items related to linking between CDL/NZ and IZ activity for consortial resources, and how to start workflows for local e-resource ordering. Pending request for ExL special meeting re: advanced invoicing topics, tax handling, etc. Fulfillment: Working on configuring NCIP so we can test. Testing manual patron blocks and the effects they have on AFN borrowing. DCFG: Hit a roadblock trying to ingest from OAC, so we’re scheduling an appointment with ExL to help us troubleshoot. In April, we will focus on ingesting records from Calisphere and local repositories. | | |
| 2 | Decisions | Discuss and approve proposed decisions | 30 | | (Go-live) Migrating/managing local Open Access (OA) bibliographic records (Go-live) Local 856 bibliographic data Can we review this PPC page: (Vanguard and Test Load) Preparation of Campus SCP Data Who should be responsible for naming the AFN functionality, FFFG or DFG?
| | |
| 3 | Test Load | When can we share the document Collaborative Workflow Testing and with whom (cohort and beyond)? Scheduling the work, especially those needing cross-FG coordination | 15 | All | Collaborative Workflow Testing Focus on migration decisions first and workflow decisions second. Migration decisions should be made by end of April. Check back on this and MVP document in April. PPC should confirm all priority 1 - set by the end of March. Can be shared with cohort. Available in the PPC folder. Confirm FGs will be using the timeline / spreadsheet for scheduling testing and cross-FG coordination.
| | |
| 4 | CDI | Review of actions from 3/24 SILS Chairs | 10 | All | PPC to draft questions for sending to the Alma consortia list to see what flavor of CDI they are using and what their experience has been. PPC to draft timeline for CDI (EA v FF) investigation so we don’t run out of time for making a decision. See update from PMs Q to Marci about this: [Q to Marci] Based on Marina’s response to our question about CDI models, UCs understand themselves to have a choice about whether they will use the FF or EA model for production (understanding that right now test load is set up to be EA). If UCs decide they want the FF model, what is the timeline for making that decision? [Marci’s response so far] Sent to Marina for follow-up (she already sent message to Product Management and Development). Will update you when we have more info.
| | |
| 5 | CDL Managed Services | Feedback on draft list of CDL managed services Is this the right level of detail? Too much, too little, just right? What is the primary goal in having us create this list? To have a document to refer to when questions come up? To allay concerns about who will manage what? What else do you want us to know about what you are hoping to get out of this document?
| 30 | Sarah | | | |
| 6 | PM Update | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project | 0 | Christine | Meetings: List of meetings on Basecamp | | |
| 7 | Homework | | | | | | |
| 8 | Parking Lot | | | | Future meeting: AEFG questions that came up were re: coordination of Analytics (cross-function?) and... how the Selector role in Alma is changing (people will care, prob fits w/ AEFG, but overloads us....)
| | |
| 9 | | TOTAL | 90/90 | | | | |
Future agenda items