Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 4
Next »
Attendees
Not attending
Discussion items
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem-solving | 5 | All | RMFG: will finalize our MVP document next week and start talking about a standard metadata export for HathiTrust; hoping to have more or less final guidance on using Connexion in time for the demo on 4/29 | | |
2 | Decisions | Discuss and approve proposed decisions | 30 | | (Go-live) RLF Bibliographic, holdings, and item records in campus IZs (Go-live) Bibliographic records to leave out of the NZ
| | |
3 | MVP | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fz3hEoApCzWR9PvMRA2Yc2Bpq0hkBdvPaxRgfyz8WJA/edit#gid=0 FGs complete by April 28th, PPC members review on April 29th, PPC discusses on April 30th
What needs to be complete by 4/28: Reassess timelines Make sure all columns/rows are complete. If the column cannot be filled in, a brief explanation will suffice. If you are unsure of what to put in a given column, enter your best guess with a question mark. If any columns have the designation “TBD”, pls indicate what needs to be done.
Delete rows that are blank and fill in any that are place holders. Resolve comments Review your categories and ensure they are properly tagged e.g, a service is something your FG is providing (like loading OCLC records); a policy which is a decision. There could also be a hybrid situation where something is a service and a recommendation (policy). Add links for any items that have a decision page Look at all the items you’ve listed to see if they are actually something your group has to do or decide e.g., if a campus wants to request analytics, what is the process? The MVP should only be added to if your group has to either enable something or make a decision about it. Delete anything that is part of a checklist for testing.
| | | | | |
4 | CDI (recurring) | Next steps ExL would like to know exactly what our concerns are with EasyActive; what is the background on this? Why do UCs not want to be on EA? Once we have this information, PMs will open a SF case documenting all concerns and questions for ExL. Other?
| | All | (Go Live) CDI: Use FullyFlexible or EasyActive activation model Update shared in Slack about Q2 in orange is updated on the decision page.
| | |
5 | PM Update | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project | 0 | Christine | Meetings: List of meetings on Basecamp | | |
6 | Homework | | | | | | |
7 | Parking Lot | | | | Collaborative Workflow Testing https://docs.google.com/document/d/19pE99m3xZKp52BJVCBElm_d4bMPCpzRQt1-cW6gf_hQ/edit Future meeting: AEFG questions that came up were re: coordination of Analytics (cross-function?) and... how the Selector role in Alma is changing (people will care, prob fits w/ AEFG, but overloads us....)
| | |
8 | | TOTAL | 90/90 | | | | |
Future agenda items