Attendees
Recording of Meeting
Meeting Recording:
Future agenda items (See the Parking Lot row on the agenda).
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welcome! | Get the meeting started; review and understand the agenda; raise questions. Record the meeting if there are no objections | 5 | Claudia | Notetaker: Jerrold Shiroma (Unlicensed) Up next: Jolene Beiser (Unlicensed) | ||
| 2 | OA/Freely Available collections and the CDI | Do we want to pursue getting Calisphere content into the CDI, and if so, on what timeline? | 10 | Everyone |
| ||
| 3 | Decision Tree (updated) + Companion Document | 15 | Everyone | Ready to share with Discovery Team as a draft? | |||
| 4 | 10 | Jump to the Display Section Mapping and then see below that Facets Section Mapping. Lisa and I think that the Discovery FG should be involved in this discussion/decision after Go-Live. | |||||
| 5 | Context Concerns when sharing individual items | Set a time for talking through the implications of these research findings for importing item records into the SILS> | 10 | For their dissertation (completed 2019), Jackson Huang of the University of Michigan Library analyzed a collection (“Chinese in California”) available at Bancroft, OAC, Calisphere, and DPLA and identified some really important issues regarding the loss of context for items as they made their way into these sites and the impact of that loss. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/149641/Huang_Jackson_20190507_Final-MTOP-Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y | |||
| 6 | Parking lot | 5 | Everyone | Kate had posted to Slack: Can we revisit a previous discussion about the COLLECTIONS feature in Alma/Primo VE? So far Kate has found that everything has to be in Alma first, in order to create the collections. UCI has one collection of this type. | |||
| 7 | TOTAL | 45 |
: