Attendees
Patrick SHANNON (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley
Jason Newborn , UC Davis (vice chair)
Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
Amador, Alicia , UC Los Angeles
, Demitra Borrero (Demitra Borrero), UC Merced
Sabrina Simmons , UC Riverside
Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
Mallory DeBartolo (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Cruz, note taker
Peter Devine , UC San Diego
Ryan White , UC San Francisco
Alison Ray (CDL) , California Digital Library (chair)
regrets:
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | record meeting | make sure Alison records meeting | 1 | Alison | |||
| 2 | VDX defaults | Is it possible to change the default delivery method in VDX to Article Exchange (now it’s Email)? (for CNRs) Yes! But only for all UCs, not individually. UCSC would also like to update the Copyright designation to CCL instead of CCG but assume that is also a system wide update? | 5 | Mallory | General support for the change. Need to write up a decision page and have CKG review. After that it’ll come back to RS-OST for a vote. |
| |
| 3 | Tipasa Pilot: configuring sandboxes | How is setting up tipasa sbs going? (making accounts) | 10 | testers: LA, R, I, SD, SB, D, and B | watch out for pw links expiring when creating accounts (24 hs) be careful if log into sb in same browser you’re logged into prod wsill (try out: different browsers, incognito/private windows/tabs) | ||
| 4 | Tipasa Pilot: local communications | How is communication going locally? | 10 | testers: LA, R, I, SD, SB, D, and B | things going great! | ||
| 5 | review Tipasa test plan | 10 | Alison + testers: LA, R, I, SD, SB, D, and B | ||||
| 6 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | ||||
| 7 | Bike Rack | Capture important topics for future discussion | ‘pu anywhere exceptions’: review shared messages, what would be next steps is the “randomized” part of the rota building actually randomizing things? Jason has a hunch that within the geographical groups it’s creating them alphabetically. (discovered in reviewing schedule c report) RLF requests sticking at B/LA when RLF can’t fill, identify what’s happening, what could be done to ease this problem Should we have some kind of organized review of release notes that apply to resource sharing? (Mallory) NRLF/SRLF rejected stuck at B/LA follow up: SH’s ‘guide’; test with what B/LA see; more escalation with ExL (scott, Mallory, Jason, patrick) ExL’s solicitation to “contribute to the Resource Sharing Directory”. Kind of a huge thing that we should think about? (Mallory) | ||||
| 8 | Total | x/x |