Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups & project timeline

Share relevant items

15 min

Josephine

Sarah

Jess

PPC:

  • PPC approved RMFG Decision for (Test load) Local bibliographic data (5XX-9XX). Customization will be allowed for 14 fields & all other fields will be standardized. This will provide for better workflow and documentation throughout the campuses. From this decision page: “***Campuses can map other 9XX data however they like but should keep in mind that long-term RMFG will be asking campuses to adopt the 9XX standardization found here: https://www.carli.illinois.edu/products-services/i-share/physical-res-man/local_extensions. The fields above represent an initial pilot project. ILSDC will be providing comments on when/if campuses can adopt the rest of the mappings before go-live or in the months following.”

DIscovery-EUOS Outreach End-User Name Subgroup:

2

UX Testing Subgroup Partnership Work Planning

Discuss best approach to coordinating subgroup partnership work

20 min

All

Reference: UX Testing Subgroup Partnership Working Plan

3

Consortia Union View Decision page draft

Finalize draft for not using NZ for consortia union view

55 min

All

Decision Page draft: https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/c/8HZ31AHH

4

Homework

Prepares team for next meeting

All

5

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

 

  • No labels