Date
, 10am-11:30am
Attendees
Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine
Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced
Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside [Today’s Notetaker]
Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego
Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)
Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library
Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara
Not attending
Discussion items
DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Meeting minutes from Dec 15, 2020 | Meeting minutes available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XFV5m-luVNLBiTYlK7G4k7WxcFc-Pgnd3mKJq10BWvQ/edit?usp=sharing | |||||
2 | Updates from other SILS groups & project timeline | Share relevant items | 10 min | Jess | Discussed upcoming Feb 5 recommendations deadline and how we might share local/statewide information discussions amongst ourselves efficiently. End User Naming Subgroup (EUNS): Delivering proposal to Working Group, asking them to adopt one of two approaches: minimalist approach (UC Library Search) or distinctive approach (UC Beacon) for further consideration and decision. Feedback was very helpful, and their proposal will likely be reviewed and discussed Working Group meeting before the end of January. | Josephine will update and reorganize Configuration Confluence page to add new useful docs and highlight most relevant for our Jan config decisions push. | |
3 | Call for RLF “subgroup” members | Recruit a few members | 10 min | All | Reminder that we need a few members to represent discovery on the RLF subgroup. Knowing the timeline for this work would help members know if they will have bandwidth. Several members suggested interest, but concern about capacity. | Josephine/Jess will check in on the timeline. Group members will consider their ability to join. | |
4 | Search Profiles Discussion | Review and work on document | 60 min | All | |||
5 | Homework | Prepares team for next meeting | All | ||||
6 | Parking Lot/Q&A | Save these issues for future discussion & comments |
|
|
|
|
R
Note from Sharon Shafer (Unlicensed) regarding agenda item 1. UCLA Library ingested the Film and Television Library catalog records during the Alma data harvest and there was concern about the unique needs of item display and search for the film and television records. UCLA Discovery Functional Group started a document to examine the MARC fields and their function. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qWW7wr3pWau7wbAbthSB9lLcv3T0xYol990FV48MpbM/edit Should we share this with RMFG?