Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

See Best Practices for Decision Pages and Tags for groups
Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED

Status

NOT STARTED

Description

Sharing local e-resources practices

Decision summary

Owning group

[group name] + [email contact]

Approver

Consulted

Informed

Decision-making process

Priority

Target decision date

[type // to add Date]

Date decided

[type // to add Date]

Recommendation

Impact

Stakeholder group

Impact

Reasoning

Background

Options Considered [remove if not needed]

Option 1

Option 2

Description

Pros

Cons

Dependencies

Questions to consider

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Notes

Status - Date of Discussion

Sarah Sheets

  • UCSB looking at AVON, http://Ancestry.com and ProQuest announces Clarivate products moving to ProQuest platform

  • UCR going live with Rialto in near future and currently testing orders

  • UCSD - Judy attending ERL and interest in creating series of status to manage work through the E-Resources Activation Task List

  • UCD assessing level of professional judgement required of staff to support Alma features including DARA, Alma Knowledgebase Updates and using software for E-Resources activation tasks - added complexity generated by network zone, Tier 1, 2, 3 analysis, and CDI.

  • UCM - as rep to UCOP Statistics, doing an environmental scan to try to identify different groups that might be trying to make the same types of assessments and how could this be more centralized (communication, data repository, etc??)

3-9-23

  • No labels