UCB may go after Sandbox refresh, same as NZ, so the data may out of sync with Production, UCB oaky with it. Hermine will let Caitlin know if if they are aware this situation
Hermine Vermeij will send out an email to UCI, UCSD, UCM reps (along with corresponding OT members--Lakshmi, Greg, and Tom) to remind them to test and send any best practices.
Standardized Holdings Policies? is there a reason to do a day 1 for UC to go with standardized practice?
This is UCSD did, it is chipping away. Ryan can share UCSD’s proposal (several years old) if anyone interested --yes
UCB: workload concern
UCSB: yes, it would be huge undertaking, but would help holding report
seems like not interested to take on this task right now
Reviewed from parking lot and added the following to the work plan
Added a new task to address local 95x-99X field in the NZ: set the target date Oct. 31, 2023, medium --review norm rule and merge rule, with possible campus cleanup
Added a new task to investigate new functionality for record retention in the NZ: set the target date Dec. 31, 2023 and medium. Adam suggest make it wait out a bit in case there are bugs
Added task to check NZ records lacking OCLC numbers (refer to records marked for deletion but have inventory attached: may need to see the scope of the project before making decision
May continue to explore ideas on information sharing session: limited search functionality below is a good topic
We need to decide high priority tasks that we need to work on:
ETD policy
Authority control
WCUs
Catherine Busselen will check if the brief rule will be done by the re-indexing job
Hermine Vermeij will send email and everyone will review the ETD policy document to finalize and publish it
6
Additional discussion
10 mins
Review items in this list; move to workplan?
Alma August release has five CZ “Managed by Community” collections where portfolios can be deleted by everyone
Interest in session answering questions on how campuses decide when or why to use CZ
Limited Search Functionality in Alma and Analytics
EL has been asked repeatedly to index all MARC fields. There is a limit on the number of local parameters we can set up, and there is a need to identify data that is not indexed (example, content type)