Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Date

2-3:30 pm (2-2:50 hereafter)

Attendees

Discussion items

Item

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Q&A (recurring) - urgent questions

Do you have a question to discuss at the meeting? Add it below with your name.

  1. (Tom) Is anyone seeing digital resources in Primo showing as “view online” from other campuses even when your campus does not have access to those resources?

    For example: A search on “Affective Learning - A Manefesto” brings up a BT Technology Journal article that Berkeley and San Diego have. Primo displays with “available online”, but we (properly) don’t have access to the article since it isn’t licensed to Merced.

  2. (Lena) Is anyone asking ExL to delete their SCP/Marcive suppressed records? What is your plan for deleting them? Note: The SCP/marcive suppressed records should be cleaned up because they will slow down searches - they are still technically in the system. These bib records will also count against our total number of bibs which has implications for the contract (costing more).

  3. (Alison/Gem for Joe Ferrie) I have a question on Basecamp that has not been answered: https://3.basecamp.com/3765443/buckets/15553579/messages/4018163741. UCLA figured out that you can suppress the Patron cancel notices by toggling off the letter, but that means that no notice is sent even under circumstances where you would want the notice to be sent . We only want to suppress the behavior when we cancel a borrowing request using the API. I archived the Basecamp issue and @Alison Ray (CDL) opened SF case #00981363

    1. Was this added to known issues page?

  4. (Alison/Gem) BROWZINE; It appears some campuses attempted the ‘experimental/option 2’ method provided by Third Iron, but this is not working (Third Iron contacted CDL about this). UCs will have to use Third Iron’s standard Alma instructions - which requires work in both IZ and NZ instance. CDL would like to partner with a volunteer campus to ensure we get the NZ part correct. What is needed:

    1. campus/IZ follows ‘Single Institution / IZ’ part of Third Iron’s instructions. (may need to un-do the ‘experimental profile/method')

    2. CDL follows ‘Multicampus/Consortia/NZ’ part of Third Iron’s instructions

    3. campus/IZ test that Browzine functions correctly - both for IZ and NZ managed resources

  5. Gillian: not a question, but an FYI. Sent this in an email to FFG chair, copied ICs.
    Problem: ILL Request link showing up on SPC records with an AEON link - when users are logged in. 
    Limited Solution (put into UC Santa Cruz production): 

    • Using GES and Display Logic Rules to hide the ILL request link on local SPC records.

    • Note: This does not work for SPC records coming from the Discovery Network in Primo, so at UCSC, even after we put our local solution in place, we still see the ILL request form on other campus Special Collections materials.

30

2

Timeline review / PM update

0

Lena

Any questions?

Coming soon…

  • Begin creation of premium Alma and Primo VE sandboxes, starting Aug 8.

  • Switch to Support Readiness Discussion (~Aug-Sept)

  • IC post-mortem in a couple of weeks: jot down things now you want to share – what worked, what didn’t work, what surprised you?

Special meetings

3

Parking lot

0

  • Sep 7-10 Analytics workshop:

    • Decide which IZ(s) to use for the analytics workshop (in addition to the NZ). Nothing will be edited during the demo. One suggestion from the trainer is to use a different IZ each day.

    • Would you like your IZ demo’ed in the analytics workshop? (Polled on slack)

      • Yes: UCB, UCSF, UCSC, UCI

      • No: UCR, UCSB

    • ICs will need to see the Qs specific to their campus in advance to know if ExL can demo their IZ to answer the Q.

    • Question from ExL: Is it OK to demo your IZ during the analytics workshop if Q’s arise that relate specifically to your campus' data? 

4

TOTAL

90/90

Review decisions and actions.

20

  • No labels