2022-12-16 Meeting notes

Attendees

Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley
Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz
Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;
Jared Campbell, UC Davis;
Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles
Anna Kahrs, UC San Francisco
Joe Ameen, UC Merced;
Sean Claudio, UC Irvine
Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara
Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego

Meeting Recording:

	Item	Desired Outcome	Notes	Decisions / Discussion
1	Sharing and Updates	Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups
2	CDI Limit by Availability	Review the Decision Page. Is there anything else that our group wants to add? If no, it’ll be sent to eResources and Fulfillment.	Decision Page: CDI Limit by Availability [Phase 4 delegated]
3	Local Resource Type		NZ Sandbox Local Resource Type Update: Reports - ready to test Looseleafs - ready to test Concerns (Slack me if you want to troubleshoot any of these together): Datasets - This uses the 593 $a but when I tried to create a set using the "local notes" index, it didn't retrieve any results. I assumed the 593 $a just isn't available in the NZ for IZ records. Video Games - This also uses the 593 $a but to my surprise, it did retrieve 4 records. Though, surely there aren't just 4 records? In any case, I've run the job against the four that exist (Nier : Automata, Star wars jedi : fallen order, Hollow knight, and Assassin's creed: Origins) LibGuides - used dc:type libguide. When I search for that, I get no results. I can't remember who requested this one? We might need to follow-up more as I don't think our Alma side has Dublin Core records?	This was a test. Did adding Custom Resource types for Reports and Looseleafs actually do any good? Sean spot checked a few and the Reports were working. Still waiting on confirmation for looseleaf. Libguides: We’re pulling them in via Primo Import, they don’t live in Alma, so there may be no way to fix it. Zoe says that it could be imported with a norm rule that would make them viewable in the NZ.
4	FRBR Preferred Records	Remind ourselves how we want to approach this issue. This is what we’ll work on when we come back January 13th.	FRBR/DEDUP Preferred Records
5			To think about: Should we create a 2+ member Discovery Steering Committee to plan work and manage the timeline? Any volunteers? Should we schedule open, optional study halls that can be used for testing with a buddy, addressing/exploring issues that come up, etc.? Jessica is always willing to buddy up for testing. Schedule is flexible. Shoot me a message.
6	New Vice Chair	Appoint a new vice chair

Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts

stick stuff here