Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

Attendees

  • Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis;

  • Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles

  • Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego

  • Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair 

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced;

Not Present:

  • Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;

  • Anna Kahrs, UC San Francisco

  • Sean Claudio, UC Irvine 

  • Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara


Meeting Recording: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X1UgV5EIwHL80wezIeuEJUaeBKQfWAh0/view?usp=share_link

Item

Desired Outcome

Notes

Decisions / Discussion

Actions

1

Sharing and Updates

Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups

enhancement process

2

UX Subgroup updates

N/A - Meeting was on a holiday

3

Database Search

Review and fill out decision page

Database Search

This still feels very nebulous.

Perhaps we shouldn’t ask “Can this replace the A-Z list” and instead look at “How can this be used as designed to help our users?”

CDLSCNZ might have results soon that change the landscape here.

4

Exclude records from Discovery Network

Flesh out testing parameters

(Go Live) Exclude Records from Discovery Network

Unfortunately, 8137 only made it to rank 41. For now, we do need to explore a work-around for this consortia-only issue.

Decision page https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/cp/4zypeM1d

UCSC’s ABAM search is still set up for this and can be used to test if items are/are not showing up appropriately.

goal: A UCR record for a UCR equipment item should not be surfaced when searching in UCSC’s database.

  • Jessica will flag a record with a 520 field and test it against UCSC’s search.
  • Jessica will create a 520 normalization rule fix.
5

2023 Enhancement Voting

FYI

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15tVr5qQURGtumhNnkhGFCYKNUdUudnR3BAEQJEVRxvE/edit?usp=share_link

If the top 20 are complex enough that Ex Libris can’t do them all, there will be a second round of voting. We’ll have Ex Libris’s response close to June.

6

Any outstanding SLACK questions or other things that have come up?

7

Review Workplan

Postponed

Work Plan

8

Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts

  • Review the possibility of leveraging Idea Exchange and enhancement points to get stuff we want developed… developed.

  • No labels