2020-06-16 Meeting notes

Updates

10 mins

Liz

Best place to record local campus' reaction to the group’s discussions/decisions? Possible places: Slack, local concerns page, decisions page, email, group email list, future meeting agenda. Among all, the decisions page seems the most appropriate place but people can document anywhere.

• Campus updates

UCLA: Discussed what records to add to NZ. ACQ like to add order records to NZ. In addition, some thoughts have been giving to local 7xx. Wondered if regular OCLC update for Vanguard NZ bib will be in place.

UCB: Contemplated the idea to identify which records are updated most recently by 005 among campuses. Questioned the rationale behind Marcive records for NZ.

UCSB: Met ExL. Concerned with finding aids bib left out of NZ and the possibility of harvesting OAC or taking advantage of CZ.

CDL: Questions about local field reserved for all campuses. (Liz has reached out to Discovery group for consultation on this subject)

Sandbox time: Primo and CZ/NZ/IZ edits

20 mins

Examples: “Why cats land on their feet”

CZ record, electronic portfolios, multiple institutions on 1 record, 9XX notes.

People are curious about how Primo determines which bib records to display when the library has both physical and electronic formats for the same title.

Liz will ask the question on BaseCamp.

The group will test the impact of duplicate bib records for ebooks/ejournals in the next meeting.

Review/update decision pages

Fist-of-five votes for potential Vanguard harmonization

50 mins

Fist-of-five decision making (see page 12)

Bibliographic records 9xx fields mapping for Vanguard

996:

1 field: UCSB, UCD, UCI

2 fields:

Question: why duplicating in 035 and 996? 035 might disappear. But, people can always find them in the original version view.

Question: If we choose to store all numbers in 996, what’s the pro and con between lumping everything in one 996 and using multiple 996s?

Bibliographic records to leave out of the Vanguard NZ Agreement on records not to load into NZ:

Local equipment; non-library reserves resources; records marked for deletion; On the fly records; Monograph records for analyzed serials lacking inventory (item record is linked to the serial record); Bound with records; Finding aids.

One reminder: These decisions are for Vanguard bib records.

Question for all campuses:

• Do people want to see DDA records from other campuses outside CDL?

• Should suppressed records beyond those with paid/cancelled orders not go into NZ? Why?

Get feedback from campuses by Monday