Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates/announcements (Please add in advance)

Share information

10 mins

All

Start recording!

Hermine (UCLA)

  • 2024-01-30 All Chairs Meeting notes

  • Local bibliographic data updated.

  • Update on Proposal for Expanded NZ Access:

    • TJ and I (along with ERES and OARMPT chairs) met with Caitlin and Gem last Friday.

    • All agree on operational need.

    • Existing process (https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/cp/3GGiBJrt) can be adapted for expanded need.

    • We will develop some principles around NZ access that will guide the process.

    • We’ll focus on two use cases right now--OA electronic inventory (practical need; good for developing principles) and ACTL (few stakeholders, “easy,” good for developing practical/technical solutions like SSO logins)

    • We’ll work under the assumption that we have the number of named accounts we need.

2

Review action items

Check in on action items

5 mins

All

https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/cp/sBLun4Ru

3

Local notes in NZ check-in

10 mins

All

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18m58pJ-_kc5ylX5dvBlIe7-6lhw8xvMQm6Yd6MGGqus/edit?usp=sharing (new)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Br2IXlEaSU7UOd1MwtyGpziOpfuAMOmW2Jpa1OrRvnQ/edit?usp=sharing

  • Berkeley is almost done resolving theirs

  • Santa Cruz is done with theirs

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10Po37fDBPm217LSIjoIHQZ3W2pIvErq4/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103196021557044230686&rtpof=true&sd=true - any concerns on deleting these?

  • Still struggling to figure out how to report well on 9XX fields in NZ. Which fields do we want to focus on to start?

  • We’re comfortable removing the 903 fields from the NZ

  • UCSC uses 993 for our Discovery records. We also map field 753 (video game platform) to 953. I can’t remember if Alma considers field 753 “legit,” even though it’s a defined field.

  • We’ll focus on the 950-999 fields in the NZ. We should exclude the 994 fields since there are tons of them (or remove all of them before we search)

  •  Hermine Vermeij will contact CDL Ops to remove the 903 fields
  •  Everyone should come up with a couple 9XX fields they use locally that we can search for in the NZ
4

NZ bibs without OCLC numbers

10 mins

All

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19Abiyut2ce0r6zDMKo_H4d42emlDDCmLxdO9cOo4qIg/edit?usp=sharing

I started looking at some of them, and there are a wide variety of problems, including:

  • Bad/incomplete merges

  • E-resource loads

  • Vendor issues

  • Human error

  • Linking errors

  • OCLC number in 035$z rather than 035$a

  • OCLC number in 935 rather than 035

  • OCLC number was deleted at some point

  • Wayward test records

Next steps?

  • It’s worth it to go through the list to find patterns and problems

  •  Everyone should go through the no-OCLC-number list and resolve records from their campus
5

Rule discussion

10 mins

All

UC Network Zone Rule Change Request Tracking Page

  • Remove protection of 590s?

  • Remove 856 fields with 2nd indicator 3 and 4?

  • Discussion deferred to next meeting

6

Restricting editing of fields

10 mins

All

Decision page: Restricting Editing of NZ Fields

  • It’s worth testing out especially on the 035. It’s also a good opportunity to test using cataloger level

7

Additional discussion

5 mins

8

Parking Lot

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18_pZKpvg4KKShzyqrbwqP2p8Cf0SkC_wlfgxxGo2UzM/edit?usp=sharing

Authority Control in the NZ

No meeting Feb. 29

  •  
9

Total

/60

...