Restricting Editing of NZ Fields

See Best Practices for Decision Pages and Tags for groups
Legend: not started IN PROGRESS STALLED decided

Status

IN PROGRESS

Description

Decide which NZ fields should be restricted

Decision summary

 

Owning group

RM (hermine@library.ucla.edu)

Approver

RM

Consulted

SCP, Campuses, Acq, ERES

Informed

 

Decision-making process

 

Priority

 

Target decision date

Mar 1, 2024

Date decided

[type // to add Date]

Recommendation

Decision: Restrict edit/delete of OCLC numbers in the 035 beginning May 20, 2024

Impact

Stakeholder group

Impact

Stakeholder group

Impact

 

 

 

 

Reasoning

 

Background

The August 2023 Alma release added a feature by which the central office can control which NZ bibliographic metadata fields can be added, edited, or deleted by Network Zone members: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/040Resource_Management/080Configuring_Resource_Management/260Restrict_Editing_of_Metadata_Fields

RM-OST restricted editing of the 590 field (see Local bibliographic data) in November 2023, primarily to prevent 590s from being added to records.

Now we would like to consider restricting additional fields that have been an issue.

Questions to consider

Which fields should be restricted?

  • 035 with prefix (OCoLC)?

  • 591-599?

  • 69X?

  • 9XX fields?

    • 950-999?

What complications would arise from restricting editing of certain fields?

 

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu