(Test Load) Non-OCLC IDs in 035 fields in bibliographic records

Decided Legend: not started IN PROGRESS STALLED decided

Status	Decided
Description	Determine whether campuses should remove non-OCLC IDs in 035 fields from records prior to migration
Decision	See below
Owning group	Resource Management FG
Approver	PPC
Stakeholders	R = Resource Management IG A = ILSDC C = ILSDC I = PPC, ILSDC
Decision-making process
Due date	Oct 6, 2020

Recommendations

There is no need to try to remove non-OCLC IDS from 035 fields in bibliographic data.

Reasoning:

RMFG did not find any evidence of problems with leaving non-OCLC IDs in bibliographic records. No incorrect records were generated or matched. Likewise, leaving OCLC numbers out of the 035 did successfully prevent records from being added/linked to the NZ.

Background

Vanguard decision page

From ExLibris:

https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Implementation_and_Migration/Migration_Guides_and_Tutorials/010Alma_Migration_Considerations_for_Consortia

You can either use a specified prefix, or you can use OCLC matching, but you cannot use both.

The UCs will be using OCLC matching, and therefore any records without an OCLC 035 should be left out of the NZ automatically.

Bibliographic records to leave out of the Vanguard NZ

Action Log

Action/Point Person	Expected Completion Date	Notes	Status

Action/Point Person	Expected Completion Date	Status
Review Vanguard page	09/29/20	Done
FG vote on test load page	10/06/20	Done
Route to PPC for approval	10/09/20
Decision routed to ILSDC	10/09/20