2020-10-15 Meeting notes
Attendees
Jo Anne Newyear-Ramirez, UC Berkeley
Xiaoli Li, UC Davis
John Philip Renaud, UC Irvine
John Riemer, UCLA
Jim Dooley, UC Merced
Tiffany Moxham, UC Riverside
Aislinn Sotelo, UC San Diego
Lidia Uziel, UC Santa Barbara
Sarah Lindsey, UC Santa Cruz (note taker)
Holly Eggleston, California Digital Library
Not attending: Haley Mcewan, UC San Francisco
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Update and checking | Discuss questions and upcoming milestones | 10 mins | All | Aislinn joining the group. |
|
|
2 | Marcive records | Do we want to buy the backfile? Do we want a UC subscription? | 20 mins |
| Cost estimate for the backfile:https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1iTetyMKWhymNEhml4D94Dr29Sn3acNKc UC subscription cost:https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1iTetyMKWhymNEhml4D94Dr29Sn3acNKc The intention with the backfile is to avoid loading legacy records in the Network Zone. The cost is based on a $.25 cost per record. After a discussion about the pros and cons of developing our own backfile the group voted and approved the idea of going ahead with purchasing the backfile. The group discussed the difference between option 1. composite print and e-records with e-resources attached vs. option 2. only electronic records. Xiaoli will find out more about these two options. |
|
|
3 | RLF records | Discuss if campuses should suppress their RLF records | 5 mins | Xiaoli | Vanguard local RLF bibliographic record migration: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KANoa3YC-39Je0-vf-VPivH2VeMQUChLqqBhbsenqBA/edit# Phase 5? Display examples:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zv3956CuEKIS6o7AivcZg7J1ETDDe4v2IIJvGNn6nqM/edit Resource Management FG is still working on this decision. |
|
|
4 | Open Access | Brainstorm ideas of how OA resources should be handled in SILS | 10 mins | Xiaoli | There was some discussion about using CDI (Primo Central Discovery Index) to manage OA resources, i.e. only activate CDI for Primo discovery and not add bibliographic records to Alma. There are a lot of good reasons to consider it but it raises a lot of questions, like: Is CDI good enough for OA, should it managed at NZ and by who? Who needs to be involved in testing it out and decision-making? Does SCP (or any campus) need to continue to catalog OA resources? Should anyone migrate existing OA bib records? How do the UC commitments to OA resources align with using CDI for discovery? PPC determined that they could not make the decision themselves. The public service escalation group is also not able to answer this question on their own. The discussion covers this idea that there are CDL managed and CDL non-managed OA resources. Xiaoli and John Riemer will say that this decision is separate from migration. |
|
|
5 | UC Discovery | Discuss questions and concerns regarding the need for a UC-wide Primo | 5 mins | John Riemer | There are different versions of Primo, instead of a single, consortium-wide version that all of us will be looking at: Primo VE Instances (Test Load) Discovery FG is reviewing whether or not a public view of a UC-wide Primo is necessary: https://uclibraries.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01UCS_NETWORK:UCS_UNION&lang=en. Do you have any questions or concerns about either way? Xiaoli suggests have it for CDL staff to use behind the scenes. |
|
|
6 | Authority control | Discuss questions and ideas about authority control in Alma | 5 mins | John Riemer | A meeting recently about "authorities" with ExL staff revealed that Alma has no effective way to get headings changed in word processor mode. There are a lot of headings with a name portion followed by a $t Title portion or subject subdivisions in $x,y,z, as well as corporate body main headings followed by various subunits in $b. For those, there is a real need to instruct the system to please change the portion of the heading that reads X to Y, regardless of what additional text string follows that. Add-on software in some existing systems allows that. ExL just said we should consider making an enhancement request for the future. Proposed coping strategy:
| Moved to next meeting. |
|
7 | Homework |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 | Parking lot |
|
|
| ETD issues:ETD Issues |
|
|
9 |
| Total | 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future agenda items
Be the first to like this
Write a comment...
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu