2023-05-19 Meeting notes

Attendees

Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz
Jared Campbell, UC Davis;
Zoe Tucker, UC Los Angeles
Douglas Worsham, UC San Diego
Joe Ameen, UC Merced;
Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;
Zach Silveira, UC San Francisco
Sean Claudio, UC Irvine
Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara
Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

Not Present

Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair

Meeting Recording:

	Item	Desired Outcome	Notes	Decisions / Discussion	Actions

	Item	Desired Outcome	Notes	Decisions / Discussion	Actions
1	Sharing and Updates	Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups	UCLA’s weird Primo VE issue: Was a result of Ex Libris testing in production. From Jackie: Many, significant problems with Primo VE and screen readers. Will be meeting with web accessibility people to research more.
2	UX Subgroup updates		Small meeting: Talked about Hathitrust collection Examples of labels and general issues to discuss. May 2023 release notes. Resource type filter bar can be turned on. UCLA is reviewing but doesn’t like it. However, it may be the new future of Primo VE.
3	UC SILS Community Slack	Determine if we want to add any additional channels.	UC SILS Community Slack #alma-idea-exchange - Should we add one for primo? Do we wand a general slack for discovery?	Gem will go ahead and make the slack channels and let UC SILS discovery know when it’s done.
4	Follow-up: Database Search	Need examples - Should we set aside a meet as a work session to look for examples?	Decision Page: Database Search Collecting https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JBn7QAtqNV1A7IhBB1nqg5GnSCUqvp7GlfHKI5HMIa4/edit?usp=sharing FYI: Multi-Part E-Collections	This feels like it’s not as high of priority right now as it’s not going to replace anyone’s A-Z list. Still likely data quality issues but we’ll plan to submit tickets as needed. Change decision page to Stalled.	Document Database Search failures so we can start identifying the multiple issues affecting searches.
5	Follow-up: Hathi Trust	Need examples	Tracking page: Spreadsheet Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKs-XQ-OFJ2p0Q4hYf3MrnQeMeRpCNtA2bMpmY82VVs/edit#heading=h.pc8lv7b944k	Looks like the adding the worldwide collection may have resolved the ranking issues. Remaining campuses will test 5 each and we’ll review next time.
6	Thoughts from ELUNA		Not a lot of concrete examples of improvements to Primo VE. They’re talking about upgrading discovery in a few years to incorporate AI, new indexing, etc.
7	Any outstanding SLACK questions or other things that have come up?		May 1 - Jesse - Exclude from discovery Network test See it in UCSF, UCM, UCB UCLA and UCSC don’t see it. UCSC did explicitly setup the search profile to exclude it.
8	Review Workplan	Postponed	Work Plan
9

Pre/Post meeting Discussion comments and thoughts

Review the possibility of leveraging Idea Exchange and enhancement points to get stuff we want developed… developed.