| | | | | | | |
---|
1 | Training / Workshop Recordings | Follow-up on creating a landing page in Confluence for trainings/workshops | 10 mins | Mallory / Caitlin | Caitlin was going to check with Gem and Alison about the publicly accessible Google Drive folder and then follow-up with Mallory after getting their feedback Any update on this? All Chairs also approved the policy for adding non-cohort staff to Google Folders Next Steps: Caitlin will write up SILS-Cohort communication for public materials folder and non-cohort access to GDrive Caitlin and Mallory will peruse Confluence after today’s meeting to determine how to add the Public Materials folder to the documentation hub in Confluence
| | |
2 | Slack Channel for Reporting / Analytics | Discuss creating a Slack Channel for Reporting / Analytics and who would have access to the channel i.e. SILS Cohort members and Non-SILS Cohort members, etc. | 10 mins | Caitlin / Team | Follow-up per OT Slack Channel conversation 108 attendees at the peak of the training Caitlin is working with Sharon Shafer (UCLA) and Lisa Wong (UCSC) on creating Office Hours - Not under the umbrella of Operations Team, but somewhat taken care of already The other request was to have a Slack Channel dedicated to discussing Reporting / Analytics This discussion should go to the full OT for further discussion and voting Is there a need to discuss this as a larger policy of adding Non-SILS Cohort members to Slack Channels created for specific reasons? Or should we discuss it on an as needed basis? Next Steps: Caitlin will create an Analytics Channel in Slack right now for SILS Cohort Members, and publicize the Channel to the Cohort Mallory will add this topic to the agenda for next week’s OT Meeting
| | |
3 | NERS Enhancements | OT-SC approval for the new process | 10 mins | Caitlin | Proposal Document Fundamental Proposal: Given that we have 600 votes in total, and that would make a difference for one enhancement, proposal is to put all 600 votes into one enhancement Asking the All-Chairs group to make a suggestion on which enhancement to support Not taking wide feedback into account, and that’s okay for this year Once we get more info based on this year, next year can be wider
All-Chairs met yesterday and are on-board with this
Caitlin is looking for tentative approval from OT-SC today Consortia votes get mashed into the same group, with only 100 votes Next steps:
| | |
4 | Annual Review | Outline what kind of info we want to gather for the annual review: user accounts, tickets, etc. | 20 mins | Caitlin | Tracking the Alma accounts distribution: UC Alma user counts As SSM, Caitlin is trying to conduct investigation into how we’re doing, in conjunction with LG, OT, etc. When this idea was brought up at All-Chairs, people saw the value in it, but there was concerns that a potential risk would be that the process would be demoralizing, and folks wouldn’t have the time to do this process So SILS Ops Center is trying to take on some of that weight, and bring information back to All-Chairs, LG, OT, etc.
OT is responsible for certain assessment such as user accounts; that is included in the OT charge What kinds of things, do we want to investigate under the umbrella of annual review? This year, we aren’t renewing, but there is potential to renegotiate Also going back to the original RFP and trying to figure out whether we are hitting the mark
Bringing this discussion back to OT would be helpful; and seeing what members of OT would like to highlight / focus Caitlin is looking for: What things do we want to take into account Designate that the SILS Ops Center can proceed and ask for help as needed; OR, if this should be a more formal working group with representatives from SILS Cohort Either way, info will be taken back to OT, LG, OSTs, etc.
Reviewing the RFP will be important, for sure Would be good to run numbers sooner rather than later, in preparation for the invoice in July Good to start having this discussions annually now, so they can expect that we’ll have these conversations going forward and set that precedent
Push for annual review is coming from SSM and OT LG should be leading the strategy of SILS, so they should be part of the quarterly business reviews What are the roles of SILS Ops Center, LG, and OT in planning operational and strategic needs for SILS? Tom could share this feedback with LG and let them know that OT-SC thinks it is important for them to be part of this strategic planning, visioning, goal setting, business review, etc.
Next Steps: Caitlin will draft a paragraph/blurb about this annual review process to share with OT-SC Tom will write to the LG Chair, Vice Chair, and Support Person to request that Caitlin be invited to this week’s LG meeting, so that Caitlin can discuss the annual review process at this week’s LG meeting
| | |
5 | Digital Collections Project Team | Discuss updates from Digital Collections Project Team | 10 mins | Jackie / Team | Digital Collections Project Team Have we heard anything since the email regarding the survey that they were interested in sending? Charge goes through June 30, 2022 They asked OT to distribute it the survey in May, but they didn’t send the link to their survey with the finalized questions
HT folks might be coming to OT to get some traction Is there outstanding work for the Digital Collections Project Team? If they’re preparing their final report, OT should know more about what’s going into that final report before it’s completed and submitted Next Steps: Tom followed-up on his last email to Madeline and included Jackie and Caitlin on that message during the meeting Tom will let Madeline know we meet Wed. at 9am alternating with OT-SC and OT, and determine when the Digital Collections Project Team can meet with either OT-SC or OT Caitlin will investigate further about the Digital Collections Project Team wrapping-up and will report back to OT-SC Mallory will add an agenda item to the next OT-SC Meeting to discuss following-up with Project Teams / Working Groups
| | |
6 | Build agenda for next OT meeting | Build and finalize the agenda for next week’s OT meeting | 5 mins | Team | | | |
7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | | | | | |
8 | | | 65 mins | | | | |