2021-01-25 Meeting notes
Attendees
@Elizabeth A. DUPUIS (Unlicensed)
@Cynthia Johnson
@Micquel Little (Unlicensed)
@Rikke Ogawa (Unlicensed)
@Sara Davidson Squibb (Unlicensed)
@Sarah Houghton
@Sarah Troy
@Beth Callahan (Unlicensed)
Not attending
@David Schmitt (Unlicensed)
@Rebecca Metzger (Unlicensed)
@Vincent Novoa (Unlicensed)
Roles
Facilitator: Beth C
Notetaker: @Sarah Troy
Timekeeper: @Micquel Little (Unlicensed)
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Welcome | Catch-up and gather together | 5 min | all |
| ||
2 | Announcements | Inform | 5 min | all | Do we need to change the time/day of our meeting? Is Monday morning working out for us, generally speaking? | Monday is generally working well, but we’re open to looking at other days/times 90 minutes is tough | @Beth Callahan (Unlicensed) will send a poll, aiming for a 60 minute timeframe, to help identify other days/times |
3 | Discussion topic: open access discovery | Check-in on each groups' progress toward writing a summary of conversations and findings related to open access discovery issues for the decision page | 30 min (10 min per group) | all | Document for reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l0a2gvpbaOsmJPLVmRGXWnIbkmvztpl7E3M8tgUJ2rQ/edit?usp=sharing
How did the subgroup work go? Do we need to adjust the assignment? How do we merge these sections together? There’s some amount of overlap between sections. We acknowledged that we have some confusion about document, content, structure | Topic for a future PSELG conversation: Do we need to try to fill in all the information gaps on the decision, or is it okay to acknowledge that this is a work in progress? | @Beth Callahan (Unlicensed) check in with Ivy and Michael about 1/11/21 JSC meeting notes Not assigned: confirm and perhaps link out to groups related to ebook strategies and/or SILS eresources task force @Rikke Ogawa (Unlicensed) will take a first pass at writing a summary for the decision page Everyone will continue adding content to the shared google document over the next 2-3 weeks We will reorder/restructure the shared document once we’ve had time to complete our contributions. |
4 | Discussion topic: system-wide Minimum Viable Product (MVP) (new topic) | Identify items for MVP Desired outcomes for MVP:
| 40 min | all | Discussion framework: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fz3hEoApCzWR9PvMRA2Yc2Bpq0hkBdvPaxRgfyz8WJA/edit?usp=sharing
Opportunity to document things that need to happen NOW, and things that need to happen at future time periods (6mos, 1yr after implementation) Focus is systemwide functionality Are there overarching issues (like the CDI/OA conversation we’re having) that we want to capture? Primo VE testing is happening in March--there are some things we can’t test until we can explore in Primo VE | Our role is to look at items that affect multiple groups to contribute those items lest they be forgotten. (Key OA resources should be accessible on Day 1. Less high priority OA resources should be available by 6 month mark.) We will provide clear, concise descriptions of what needs to be working and when. | soft deadline for contributions: sometime in February 2021 @Beth Callahan (Unlicensed) will create MVP spreadsheet just for PSELG that mimics the shared MVP document. (link to the PSELG MVP document is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lL_Vh5vdqbak0SflPjtc0LLBO14eQ_eOsw74pzeIYq4/edit?usp=sharing ) Everyone will contribute to the spreadsheet for a discussion to be had 2 meetings from now focused on what we should contribute to the shared MVP document. |
5 | Wrap-up and next steps | Review actions and assignments | 5 min | All |
|
| We will next meet on February 8 (no meeting on February 1) |
6 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
| Total | 85 min |
|
|
|
|
Future agenda items
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu