2023-12-07 Meeting notes

Attendees

Jharina Pascual, Vice-Chair, UCI
Michelle Polchow, UCD
Sherry Lochhaas, CDL
Natalee Bell, UCSB
Jeremy Whitt, UCLA
Jason Dezember, UCB
Carla Arbagey, UCR
Sarah Sheets, UCM
Katie Keyser, UCSF
Judy Keys, UCSD

Not in attendance:

Tamara Pilko, Chair, UCSC

Meeting documents:
Meeting Recording & Chat (link to file in Google Drive)

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions
1	Record: Tamara Announcements: Poll - keep/cancel remaining Dec meetings?	Share announcements	5 min	@Tamara Pilko	Note taker/Actions: @Paula Pascual Timekeeper:
2	Standing Item: ExLibris Support Tickets (UC/ExL mtg, monthly on 3rd Friday: agenda)	Info Share	2 min		any outstanding items from the last support meeting? any items to add to this month’s agenda?
3	Q&A and Analytics Dashboard Demo with Sam Cooc (UCD)		25		Sam Cooc will send slides to @Tamara Pilko Recording is available
4	https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DIS/pages/1878687745 with Gem Stone-Logan (DISC)		25		Disc is looking at pros & cons of this setting, unsure at this point if we’ll harmonize Documentation Testing doc from discovery if you have portfolios for a collection: it's not supposed to show CDI for the ebooks if you DON'T have portfolios for the collection: It is supposed to still show CDI for the ebooks If you have a list of portfolios in a collection but it's spotty (missing titles) and CDI has more ebooks, CDI won't fill in the gaps. It will completely ignore the collection. They have identified some spotty collections. If an item is listed as a dissertation and not an ebook, it's not excluded. Overall it does reduce duplication (good). Some cases they can’t determine why dups weren’t reduced. Discovery has not reached out to RM, Eres showed more interest at All Chairs. Not yet looking at whether to use the individual collection settings instead of the overall setting. Will keep an eye out for any individual collections causing big dup problems. Concerns & need ERES feedback: whether it's removing things we don't expect or are unaware of What other areas should they be testing, what are they missing (they want ERES feedback & ideas)? Look at the testing doc. Is the CDI record quality better than CZ record quality – enough to keep CDI? Try to give feedback by Mid-January. Question/comments from eres: were frbr settings (or other settings) recorded while testing? A) If you don’t have it on, it will show you everything regardless (the setting does nothing). Campuses tested in sandbox using the same settings they have in production. Presentation from UT (Ask Michelle for link) Please submit feedback to Gem Stone-Logan by mid January via email, Slack, or write testing information on this form (please identify your campus): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1719jOnL9AVDe-QluAmM-3x2uFC_I7Nv_talAwGF8UOo/edit#gid=284305836
5	Wrap Up + Action Items	Review action items and next steps	3 min	@Paula Pascual
6	Parking Lot	Capture important topics for future discussion:
7		Total	60/60