2022-04-01 Meeting notes

Attendees

Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Sean Claudio, UC Irvine
Joshua Gomez, UC Los Angeles
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced
Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair
Michele Mizejewski, UC San Francisco
Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara
Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library
Dominique Turnbow, UC San Diego, Vice Chair

Not present:

Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz

Zoom Link to meeting (10 am): https://ucr.zoom.us/j/91924598177?pwd=VlNDV0srcWNocWtFcEtsTnhRcFdFZz09

Meeting Recording: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cBFl1pxjZNUyOWLswDVdLPTUJV9mT6qs/view?usp=sharing

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions
1	Sharing and Updates	Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups	5	All
2	Update: Single OCLC symbol for consortia e-content.	Identify if the new information creates new concerns or if we’ll continue to wait for ILL’s decision.		all	This is in regards to using SCPER for all consortia e-content, not for using a single symbol for regular holdings. Discussion Page: Discovery Impact of Resource Management's OCLC Streamlined Worldcat Holdings Project 2022		Jessica will e-mail the Resource Management chair with DISC’s concerns and a request for examples to better understand how users will access e-Resources content under a single SCPER symbol.
3	Revisit: Shared Code Repository			@Joshua Gomez @Gem Stone-Logan	Mobile usability issues Shared Repository Proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEdjMzrhoLfOl6a5AmUCevhZywXuiM31jebHhJJ91Hs/edit#heading=h.36u2v11b1agr	Team approved GitHub proposal. Gem is sending it up the ladder. Joshua, Sean, and Michael will meet to discuss how to best handle reviewing source code.
4	Review: excluding CDI ebooks	Identify pros/cons of including/excluding CDI eBooks from default Articles, books, and more.		all	Discussion Page: Exclude eBooks from CDI Results UCI Testing View for excluding CDI eBooks Questions to consider: What are the potential risks of enabling “Exclude eBooks from CDI Results”? Are there any serious current problems that could be solved by enabling “Exclude eBooks from CDI Results”?	Team has not had ample opportunity for testing. We will revisit this issue when we’ve had time to do actual testing.	Jessica will update the Discussion Page to include areas for the team to add questions, thoughts, and updates moving forward.
5	Review: How do the campuses utilize 930/973 fields?				Discussion Page: Discovery Impact: 930/973 fields - Practice for Continued Use Do your local campuses use a local MARC field like 973? Or do they use Alma’s built in tools? Does this use have any impact on the Discovery or is it only a back-end staff use field?	It doesn’t seem like any campus uses the 973 locally to track e-collections anymore, but they do use it for legacy information.	Jessica will gather the documentation needed for campuses that may want to keep using the 973 locally going forward
6	Review: Digital Collections Decision Tree				Discussion Page: Digital Collections Decision Tree		Jessica will ask DCPT if there are sandbox examples of collections that we can look at so we can better understand the impact each branch of the tree has on discovery.
7	Standing Item: Review Issues Spreadsheet and Parking Lot.				Issue tracking decision still pending (Shared code repository may be involved)
8	Wrap up	Review actions and decisions	5
9	Parking Lot	Capture important topics for future discussion:			Discussion Parking Lot / Future Topics
10		Total	45