2020-11-05 Fulfillment & ILL FG Meeting notes
Date
Nov 5, 2020 11:00 AM
Attendees
@Mark Marrow , UC Berkeley
@Jason Newborn , UC Davis
@Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
@Elizabeth Rodriguez (Unlicensed) , UCLA
@Sahra Klawitter , UC Riverside
@Micquel Little (Unlicensed) , UC San Francisco
@Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
@Joseph Ferrie , California Digital Library
@Kristen Cardoso (Unlicensed), UC Santa Cruz Note Taker
@Judea D'Arnaud, UC San Diego
Absent
@Joe Ameen , UCM (Liaison)
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Check-in/ Updates | PPC meeting updates and review of any action items from last meeting Quick share of any local team updates |
| All |
|
|
|
|
2 | RLF Ghost Records Discussion |
| All | Lynne Grigsby asked if our group could make recommendations regarding ghost records for items sent to the RLFs, as practices differ across campuses. If we end up with direct requesting, we would not want these items to be requestable, and we may not want them to be visible either. Joe talked to Anna Striker from the shared print program and they need to regularly check for ghost records to minimize duplicates in accounting. Suppressing in Discovery will not exclude them from the Fulfillment Network, so they will need to be made non-requestable as well. Need to pull in the Resource Management Group, the Discovery FG, and the RLF group. The RLF group is on hiatus until January. | Everyone agreed that the draft was ready to go as written, using the terminology of “phantom record” instead of “ghost record.” | Elizabeth will share our recommendations with the PPCs, and then the Resource Management Group, the Discovery FG if needed. Linda Michelle will share with the RLF Group after Elizabeth meets with the PPCs. |
| |
3 | Group Testing Session | We’ll be spending this meeting testing together. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkVj-qrujBf3NlLtaTVFzPP1q5Vn7HPpdi3Ce0ZY1bg/edit
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bUjEXKsrlnxASwoYzjm-DmZNpAAnxUge5eR0o9rXDsI/edit#gid=103680270 https://drive.google.com/drive/u/3/folders/1S_UJPBKDBbhIr2C-jEi05_r4076SkQJE?ths=true |
| All | We can’t test GES Request fully until we have NCIP configured. We can confirm that the request submitted through Primo was successfully sent into VDX. Micquel asked about barcode and primary identifier considerations for moving from Millennium to Alma. Joe confirmed that patrons can log in using any identifier, but there’s only one patron record in VDX - it gets normalized on their primary identifier. Currently, the NCIP integration configuration is different on each campus. We may want to harmonize. It may help to attach documentation from existing campuses, such as UCD. |
| The group will create a decision page recommending NCIP integration. Existing NCIP campuses will share out any configuration documentation they may have. |
|
4 | User Experience Subgroup Meeting | Quick update on first meeting and schedule future meeting with our FG |
| Kristen and Linda Michelle | Will be doing testing in the Berkeley Primo VE of 15 scenarios (3 per person), with the goal of delivering a draft report to our FG on Monday, November 23rd. The two groups will meet that week before the Thanksgiving break, and then deliver the final report to the Discovery FG on Tuesday, December 1st.
Joe and others are interested in also testing email communications if possible. | Everyone agreed to move ahead with the proposed timeline. Only UCLA is currently set up to enter a patron’s barcode into GES. Joe can set this up for Berkeley, but will need the Administrator role. | Kristen and Linda Michelle will go ahead and schedule a time for the two groups to meet. Joe will work with Mark to set up the Berkeley Primo for GES request testing. |
|
5 | Parking Lot |
|
|
| There are some questions around what other things this group might add to the parking lot. Expiration dates and whatnot.
| Members can add to the parking lot issues that they feel need to be considered or tracked. |
|
|
6 |
| DDS Decision Page (Go-Live) Document Delivery Service (DDS) Setup Config forms - local campuses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 | Harmonization work | Continue our discussion and come up with loan periods to propose for fulfillment network/locally https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-W2psaW6GsgOTD1ByTHRF00bikcnVR6W/edit#gid=1939968629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
| Total | x/x |
|
|
|
|
|
Future agenda items
Form requested by Ex Libris: what is our role in completing the form? what is the role of local implementation teams? (see https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MbLg08j5grFfaCMGQ9Pde1UBmw06UAqf/view?usp=sharing )
Discussion with Discovery team about naming/labeling of UC Interlibrary Loan button.
Should we modify our decision page to recommend “Lender of last resort” as the preferred ILL integration model.
SILS ILL CKG and/or town hall resource sharing demo.
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu