2020-06-22 IC-SC Meeting notes
Date
Jun 22, 2020 3-4
Attendees
@Carlo Medina (Unlicensed) , co-chair
@Caitlin Nelson, SSM
@Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) , PM
@Tom Bustos , co-chair
Not attending
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Check-in / Update | Report any major changes in availability / circumstances Reminder to ensure everyone got the 2-hour meeting invite. | 5 | All |
|
|
|
2 | Anything issues from Slack, Email, Basecamp that need discussion, action? |
|
| All |
|
|
|
3 | Sharing decisions at local campus groups (discussed briefly in PPC) | How should we communicate this? Every FG is representative and will consult locally and bring decisions to their local group. The IC is the chair of the local group so ultimately IC is charged to ensure decisions are implemented in local groups. | 5 | Caitlin |
|
| @Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) add to Ops Leads agenda: where have we documented communication path from project to local group? (see All Chairs meeting notes). Good to have a place of record to link to. |
4 | Ex Libris meetings and cohort | Determine process for who to include in meetings with Ex Libris and ensuring they are informed/invited well in advance. (Briefly discussed by ExL/PMs on 6/18; discussed in PPC 6/19). Proposal: As a general rule, Ex Libris meetings are for ICs. All meetings will be recorded and the cohort will have access to the spreadsheet with the recording links. PMs will look ahead to upcoming meetings to surface who should attend beyond the ICs; Consult with PPC and ICs. (Alison Ray asked on IC channel) Are Special Meetings/Office Hours open to anyone at UC (i.e., campus local groups)? Or, is it IC-only participation to ensure the meeting stays on focus? Then providing the recordings to all meetings for the cohort (who could share locally, as desired.) | 5 | Lena |
|
| @Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) and @Caitlin Nelson will summarize the communication plan for weekly Ex Libris meetings. |
5 | Ex Libris meeting recordings for cohort | Confirm we can share links to meeting recordings with the cohort. Should we encourage ICs and PPC to share recordings more broadly with their local campus groups? How do we publicize the spreadsheet? Put it in the Cohort main folder (rather than IC folder)? Link to it from Confluence home page? Should we ask everyone to record meetings to the cloud so local groups can have access? That is, if the meeting is downloaded onto the Cohort google shared drive, access will be limited. | 5 | Lena |
|
|
|
6 | Communicating about vanguard training plan | Is everyone (IC, TOC, PPC) in agreement about who will participate in training (meetings, testing, etc.)? We need to ensure the message is consistent and share it with Com Leads for communicating broadly. Notes from meeting with Marci: Typically, vanguard is much smaller; training for vanguard will be repeated later for the full cohort. It’s fine to participate in training during vanguard if desired. Training is needed for vanguard testing. Vanguard campuses will test in their environments; Merced could follow along using their sandbox. | 5 |
|
|
|
|
7 | Access to sandboxes for non-vanguard libraries | Xiaoli (PPC) asked: What’s the plan for the vanguard environment (including sandboxes) during the vanguard phase? What decisions/discussion has happened in the ICs around sandboxes? What’s the best way to allow non-vanguard libraries to have access to vanguard sandboxes to see how data is showing up? Related: Would sandboxes be a good discussion item for SILS Chairs meeting? Would Tom and Carlo want to facilitate that discussion? | 5 | Lena |
|
| @Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) to add to the weekly PM meeting with Marci agenda: discuss testing |
8 | Decisions in process | Awareness of any decisions in the queue that need consultation from ICs Do we need to revisit the idea of having PMs (or someone) review decisions in process to ensure the RACI/decision-making process is fleshed out? For example, the ICs were not mentioned as consultants in the Order of Load for the NZ. Also, would a final date be helpful for the decision rollup? Currently, the due date is the closest thing but it might vary by weeks from the final approval date. | 10 |
| https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IC/pages/518652656 |
|
|
9 | Meeting backups | What agreement did you make in the group? Here’s the taking time off policy. Do we know how long Lakshmi Arunachalam will be filling in? Do we need to add her to project collab tools, listservs, etc.? | 5 | Lena |
|
| @Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) will inquire at UCI how long a replacement is needed. |
10 | ILSDC and Patron Data deliverables | ILSDC and Patron Data have deliverables with deadlines in their charge: who/how are they monitoring those deliverables?
| 5 |
|
|
| @Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) will invite Greg and Catherine to the next IC-SC meeting (6/29) |
11 | Set IC agenda https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IC/pages/587399379 |
| 10 | All | Ran out of time. Caitlin and Lena reviewed the agenda. |
|
|
12 | Other / Homework |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
| TOTAL | 60 / 60 |
|
|
|
|
Future agenda items
The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu