2025-01-08 RS OST meeting notes

Attendees

@Kristen Van Vliet , UC Berkeley (chair)
@Jason Newborn , UC Davis
@Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
@Sabrina Simmons , UC Riverside
@Ryan White , UC San Francisco
@Helena Gagnon , UC Santa Barbara
@Dawson Kelly (UCSC) , UC Santa Cruz (vice chair)
@Alison Ray (CDL) , California Digital Library
@Judea D'Arnaud , UC San Diego
@Aylin Medrano, UC Los Angeles
regrets: @Amador, Alicia , UC Los Angeles, @Demitra Borrero , UC Merced

Zoom URL: https://berkeley.zoom.us/j/99437694899?pwd=9nX1Pd82i2VWzoHcIjPs3mPf2nreSn.1

	Topic / Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions

	Topic / Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions
1	make sure Kristen records meeting / any announcements?	1	Kristen	Any announcements?
2	VDX-VDX Billing Subgroup.	15	Kristen	Documenting outstanding VDX requests. UC Davis & UCSF both need to finish filling out the policies section. Hope is still to have items filled in by Jan 31st. Lets check in about how realistic this expectation is. end of Jan seems okay to those in meeting.
3	Moving Berkeley to “UC Northern Universities” in Rota	5	Kristen	Anyone not made the changes to their institution zone?		@Alison Ray (CDL) 2x check email responses & reach out to any missing on updating IZ rota; follow up as appropriate
4	SRLF LUO Bookstrap Checking	5	Kristen	Any feedback from RS-OST on how these worked now that we’ve tried them for a full Semester/Quarter? positive feedback from UCSC & UCSF	RS OST positive for moving forward with no objections
5	Judea’s P2P Email	15	Judea	Lets talk about it! subset of P2P group that would have small P2P alongside AFN partners; wish to set up set up P2P partners, then AFN rest of UC, then WSILL CDL: yes, possible. This setup is more complicated than original proposal UCD: may create double requests → once for P2P & once for AFN (CDL: or change AFN rules) UCSF: some trepidation about P2P, easiest to not change project at this point; P2P handling more work than AFN UCSD: banking on promises of auto-matching issues in AFN; (CDL: ExL indicated P2P auto-match uses same logic as AFN) UCSC: how much interest in going forward? what if UCSD was only P2P lender? (UCSD: at least two campuses) → no other campuses express interest in moving into new P2P project UCI: would want to reevaluate sub project (on its own) - too different from all-in flavor	revisit P2P project idea in Sep 2025
6	impromptu discussion about Tipasa organization			who to invite to Tipasa meetings with OCLC (answer: anyone you think is appropriate)
7	Wrap up & action points	5		1/15/25 CKG, no RS OST
8	Active Project Updates / Next steps and discussion times	5	Kristen	Non-Alma billing group working with Fulfillment OST. UCR, UCB, UCSC, mbe UCM. First meeting Nov 4th. list of AFN reports - TBD/subgroup working Tentative Dec 11 2024; Tipasa - OCLC guest spot to discuss Draft_UC_Tipasa_Implementation_Plan_September2024-1 schedule c reports - reminder check Sept for June 2024 fallout requests P2P project - testing in sandbox. Wrap up discussion on Dec 4th RLF lib use only / bookband pilot - January 2025 ish
9	(bike rack) Capre important topics for future discussion			Do we want to keep physical P2P requesting turned on?
10	Total	x/x