2023-01-09 RS OST meeting notes

Attendees

@Patrick SHANNON (Unlicensed) , UC Berkeley
@Jason Newborn , UC Davis (vice chair)
@Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
@Amador, Alicia , UC Los Angeles
@Demitra Borrero (Demitra Borrero), UC Merced;
@Sabrina Simmons , UC Riverside
@Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
@Mallory DeBartolo (Unlicensed) , UC Santa Cruz, note taker;
@Peter Devine , UC San Diego
@Ryan White , UC San Francisco
@Alison Ray (CDL) , California Digital Library (chair)
regrets:

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions

	Item	Desired Outcome	Time	Who	Notes	Decisions	Actions
1	record meeting	make sure Alison records meeting	1	Alison
2	Timing & timeline of ‘implement’ decision page	Considering UC Calendar, what would be ‘go live date’ list of topics/points to put in decision page: why still Tipasa? what gaps are there? define next phase (develop/test) date for end of ‘develop/test’ phase & go/nogo for implementation	17ish	All	OCLC projects “lighter” implementation effort full automation delivers April 2023 UCB begins fall 2023 instruction wed august 23		homework: for next meeting, come with a Tipasa golive date homework: think about how much ‘lead time’ wanted to sign off for moving forward with implementation → what would signify end of ‘develop/test’ phase @Alison Ray (CDL) start draft of ‘develop/testing phase' golive Jan 20, 2023
3
4
5	List of gaps uncovered by Tipasa Pilot						@Alison Ray (CDL) try to update List of gaps uncovered by Tipasa Pilot from OCLC release schedule Jan 17, 2023
6	Wrap up	Review actions and decisions	5
7	Bike Rack	Capture important topics for future discussion			‘pick up anywhere exceptions’: review shared messages, what would be next steps metrics on how often ‘pick up anywhere’ requests have to be changed to home campus (Jason) → may lead to: editing pu loc for this requests → may lead to: harmonizing bookbands is the “randomized” part of the rota building actually randomizing things? Jason has a hunch that within the geographical groups it’s creating them alphabetically. (discovered in reviewing schedule c report) NRLF/SRLF rejected stuck at B/LA follow up: SH’s ‘guide’; test with what B/LA see; more escalation with ExL (scott, Mallory, Jason, patrick) ExL’s solicitation to “contribute to the Resource Sharing Directory”. Kind of a huge thing that we should think about? (Mallory) → maybe after P2P investigation…
8		Total	x/x