• In progress
  • 2023-02-27 10 am AASA-PT Meeting Notes

    Attendees

    • CDL @Daisy Nip

    • CDL @Danielle Westbrook

    • CDL @Gem Stone-Logan

    • Berkeley: @Chan Li (Steering Committee)

    • Irvine: @Ellen Augustiniak (Steering Committee)

    • Merced:@Sarah Sheets

    • Riverside:@Michele Potter (Steering Committee) -

    • San Diego: @Heather Hernandez (Unlicensed)

    • San Francisco: @Susan Boone

    • Santa Cruz:@Lisa Wong

    Regrets:

    • Davis: @Alison Lanius

    • LA: @John Riemer

    • Santa Barbara: @akshayagrawal

    Item

    Desired Outcome

    Time

    Facilitator

    Notes

    Decisions

    Actions

    Item

    Desired Outcome

    Time

    Facilitator

    Notes

    Decisions

    Actions

    1

    Record Zoom meeting

    Review previous notes and tasks

     

    5m

    @Ellen Augustiniak

    Reminder: Share any related policies/guidelines/local-practices that inform statistics.

    Actions from last meeting are still under development.



    Share any up-to-date, enlightening cataloging or acq policies to Google Drive. - due 6 March.

    2

    Harmonization Analysis: Sub team Update

    Update and discussion.

    Request for input on Schedule D data requirements and proposed approach.

     

    30m

    Harmonization sub team (Michele, Daisy to lead)

    Update: The subteam has now reviewed all UCL/UCOP data requirements and proposed adjustments for clarity, harmonization, and to standardize with both ARL and ACRL. An overview (e.g., table) of the proposed changes will be circulated for project team review and feedback - likely for the next meeting.

    Schedule D

    • Schedule D is currently utilized by UCOP Risk Management, to submit to our insurer; are there additional campuses uses for Schedule D?

    • Strategy (based on principle to stop/avoid manual counts): To only report to OP/Risk Management/Insurer what is catalogued and can be reported via Alma Analytics.

    • The subteam discussed two potential strategies:

      • We/the UC Libraries could try to align “Material Types“ in Alma Analytics to the materials currently listed in Schedule D or to a modified Schedule D list (e.g., where some terms are “folded up” into a higher level category.

      • Or, we could utilize “Resource Type” in Alma Analytics (which is based on the MARC headers), and then provide OP/Risk/Insurer with the entire export/table.

      • Subteam recommends second approach (using full Resource Types table). This will require OP/Risk/Insurance buy-in, but seems like a viable option (dww to confirm after this project team discussion).

    • See Material Types and Resource Types tables.

    • Discussion:

      • One issue in advancing harmonization is what UCOP is asking for through Schedule D; thus far, and spread across different ILSs pre-SILS, the libraries have bent our data to meet the physical holdings by location and material types listed in Schedule D. But now that we are on the same system, we’re seeking a standardized/set approach to types (consistent across campuses) for meeting schedule D requirements; such a change (to the types listed in D) will require us to propose a revised Schedule D to UCOP (as the libraries likely designed the original Scheduled D, this seems like an appropriate/reasonable path).

      • In Alma, Material Type is “alterable” - we can make changes. But Resource Type is purely back-end and based on MARC header (not alterable - these are fixed types).

      • For Material Type, the differences in use are natural (e.g., where campuses are using “Issue” vs. “Bound Issue”; or “Book” vs “Volume”); they also likely represent some edits made on the fly (to add type for iPad, Tablet, etc.).

      • For Schedule A, the subteam is also proposing that we use Resource Type for electronic resources (Schedule A; Title subject area). For Schedule D, proposing Resource Type from physical item. More details to follow.

      • Overall: Project team supports this change, though they note the need to socialize locally and with UCOP.

     

    Action: Michele (and the Harmonization subteam) will distribute a feedback form/table with Steering for their input; and then to the entire project team (likely with full team by next meeting).
    Action: Danielle will begin to socialize changes to Schedule D with our UCOP Risk Management Office (and insurer).

     

    3

    Wrap up

    Review actions and decisions

    5m

     

     

     

     

    4

    Parking Lot

    Capture important topics for future discussion

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The SILS mission is to transform library services and operations through innovation and collaboration. The future is shared!
    Question? Contact AskSILS-L@ucop.edu